1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-71809-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Aspects of Radioimmunoassay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data showed that the reliability of estimations for unknown samples, and consequently the clinical value of the laboratory results, was affected by the statistical model used for the calibration curve. First, we confirmed data from the literature concerning the inadequacy of the straight line regression model, commonly used in laboratory practice to fit calibration curves (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)27). Moreover, in its standard use, this approach did not yield any information about the variance of the dose-response curve.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data showed that the reliability of estimations for unknown samples, and consequently the clinical value of the laboratory results, was affected by the statistical model used for the calibration curve. First, we confirmed data from the literature concerning the inadequacy of the straight line regression model, commonly used in laboratory practice to fit calibration curves (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)27). Moreover, in its standard use, this approach did not yield any information about the variance of the dose-response curve.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Such a situation, coupled with possible non-normal distribution of errors, prevents the correct application of standard inference procedures for statistical testing and interval estimation (24). Accounting for the non-linear dose-response relationship, suitable statistical methods were required to estimate the variance function parameter u (27). Furthermore, the use of an assay design with a geometric progression in calibrator concentrations is unsuitable for building a straight line calibration model (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intra-and interassay coefficients of variation were calculated according to the method of Rodbard (1971 For personal use only. …”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the within-assay coeffi cient of variation (CV) was 7%; the between-assay CV was 12%; the assay can detect as little as 3 pg of VP. For the OT RIA, the withinassay CV was 6%; the between-assay CV was 15%; the assay can detect as little as 10 pg OT [15].…”
Section: Radioimmunoassay1 !mentioning
confidence: 99%