1981
DOI: 10.1016/0034-6667(81)90001-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical approaches to R-values and the pollen— vegetation relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
182
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
182
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The REVEALS model is similar to the R-value model (Davis 1963), with the added inclusion of the pollen dispersal coefficient of each taxon. The model aims at reconstructing vegetation abundance within an entire region, so background pollen loading coming from outside the region is ignored, unlike the Extended R-value models (Parsons and Prentice 1981;Prentice and Parsons 1983;Sugita 1994), where regional background pollen loading is included. The formula for the REVEALS model is (Sugita 2007a):…”
Section: The Landscape Reconstruction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The REVEALS model is similar to the R-value model (Davis 1963), with the added inclusion of the pollen dispersal coefficient of each taxon. The model aims at reconstructing vegetation abundance within an entire region, so background pollen loading coming from outside the region is ignored, unlike the Extended R-value models (Parsons and Prentice 1981;Prentice and Parsons 1983;Sugita 1994), where regional background pollen loading is included. The formula for the REVEALS model is (Sugita 2007a):…”
Section: The Landscape Reconstruction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decades, methods have been developed that allow us to distance weight vegetation data according to models of pollen dispersal and deposition (Prentice 1985;Sugita 1993); to estimate the relative pollen productivity of different plant taxa from pollen/vegetation calibration datasets (Parsons and Prentice 1981;Prentice and Parsons 1983;Sugita 1994) and to assess the source area of pollen for different basin types and sizes (Sugita 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sugita modified this taphonomic model to incorporate mixing of pollen across a lake surface, and defined a pollen source area for the whole pollen assemblage, the Relevant Source Area of Pollen or RSAP (Sugita, 1993(Sugita, , 1994. The RSAP is defined in terms of the Extended R-value approach, an iterative means of estimating the parameters of the pollen dispersal and deposition model from empirical data (Parsons and Prentice, 1981;Prentice and Parsons, 1983). Where vegetation data are available from multiple radii around the basin, the distance at which adding further vegetation data to the analysis leads to no improvement in the likelihood function score (a measure of goodness of fit between the fitted model parameters and the empirical data) is defined as the RSAP for the whole assemblage being studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Extended R-Value or ERV analysis (Parsons and Prentice, 1981;Prentice and Parsons, 1983) approach offers a means of determining RPP and u i from interdependent percentage data using the maximum likelihood method (Fisher, 1912) to find the set of parameter estimates which give the best fit between corrected values of a dataset of pollen-vegetation data pairs from multiple locations. Although ERV analysis can be carried out on singledistance vegetation survey data (e.g.…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of relative pollen productivity can be extracted from extended R-value analysis (Parsons and Prentice, 1981) using comparisons between pollen assemblages deposited into sedimentary contexts, such as moss polsters, and measurements of the present day vegetation cover around the sampled location. Vegetation survey method has been shown to have a profound effect on estimates of model parameters (Bunting and Hjelle, 2010), therefore a standard method is an essential pre-requisite for testing some of the key assumptions of pollen-based reconstruction of past vegetation; such as the assumption that relative pollen productivity is effectively constant in space and time within a region or biome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%