2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Approaches for Gene Selection, Hub Gene Identification and Module Interaction in Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis: An Application to Aluminum Stress in Soybean (Glycine max L.)

Abstract: Selection of informative genes is an important problem in gene expression studies. The small sample size and the large number of genes in gene expression data make the selection process complex. Further, the selected informative genes may act as a vital input for gene co-expression network analysis. Moreover, the identification of hub genes and module interactions in gene co-expression networks is yet to be fully explored. This paper presents a statistically sound gene selection technique based on support vect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, a generalized Mann–Whitney U (MWU) test was also applied for gene set-level inferences. Finally, hub genes were determined by the topological feature of coexpression networks [ 16 ]. Using the proposed analysis method, susceptible pathways and crucial genes will be revealed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, a generalized Mann–Whitney U (MWU) test was also applied for gene set-level inferences. Finally, hub genes were determined by the topological feature of coexpression networks [ 16 ]. Using the proposed analysis method, susceptible pathways and crucial genes will be revealed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, exploiting these data and drawing valid biological insights has posed a great challenge to researchers across the globe. For instance, in a gene expression (GE) study, the expression levels of several thousand(s) of genes are measured in a single experiment and further used for identifying the groups of genes which are relevant to the condition/trait under study [ 2 , 3 , 4 ]. Earlier, biologists considered this differential expression (DE) study as the end of their analysis [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the DE analysis produces a list of associated genes ranked by the ascending or descending order of the magnitude of computed test statistic(s)/ p-values (e.g., Z-score, fold change, t-test, etc.) [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. This is a crucial step undertaken by the experimental biologists and genome researchers to select the informative genes as well as to obtain a global view of expression changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent advancement in genome sequencing technologies leads to generation of tremendous volume of high-throughput biological data 1 . Meanwhile, exploiting these data and drawing valid biological knowledge has posed a great challenge to scientists across the globe 2 . For instance, in genome wide expression study, the traditional objectives are (a) obtaining the expression levels of several thousand(s) of genes for the samples belonging to at least two different contrasting phenotypic/ environmental conditions, (b) identifying the genes which are relevant to these conditions under study among large pool of genes 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in genome wide expression study, the traditional objectives are (a) obtaining the expression levels of several thousand(s) of genes for the samples belonging to at least two different contrasting phenotypic/ environmental conditions, (b) identifying the genes which are relevant to these conditions under study among large pool of genes 3 . Moreover, for the later objective, several statistical and machine learning approaches have been developed 2 , 4 . Further, the selected genes are expected to have major causal role for the phenotypic trait under study 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%