2017
DOI: 10.4271/2017-24-0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Approach on Visualizing Multi-Variable Interactions in a Hybrid Breakup Model under ECN Spray Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The usual mesh and time-step independence studies were conducted to ensure model convergence. Independence is found for a mesh size of 0.45 mm × 0.45 mm (∼1,335,096 cells) and a time step of 5e–7 s. 51 These settings can be carried over throughout the investigation. The selected sub-models are listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Numerical Setupmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The usual mesh and time-step independence studies were conducted to ensure model convergence. Independence is found for a mesh size of 0.45 mm × 0.45 mm (∼1,335,096 cells) and a time step of 5e–7 s. 51 These settings can be carried over throughout the investigation. The selected sub-models are listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Numerical Setupmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The DoE parameters, their range and phenomenological significance are collected in Table 4. Nsikane et al 51 showed how in these cases, an adjustment of C 2 was selected to achieve good results. In our more recent studies, both C 1 and C 2 are considered as DoE variables.…”
Section: Design Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulation results within this framework rely on multiple user-defined variables which need validation to extended operating conditions to be considered predictive. Different studies have tried to enhance RANS simulations predictive capabilities by investigating input-variables sensitivity [10,11]. Run times and required resources are still unacceptable for virtual hardware screening and calibration at a powertrain system level.…”
Section: Available Solutions To Improve the Virtualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFD RoHR predictions at multiple operating points for each of the engine design screened during the concept stage of development remain unpractical. This is due to the limited time available to define the first engine concept [3], limited experimental data available to tune CFD models and the lack of consensus on how modelling coefficients should be set [10,41]. CFD analysis can be used later in the development process, once the concept design is defined [8,38,39,41].…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%