2015
DOI: 10.26634/jmat.4.2.3499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Applications of Survival Data Analysis for Breast Cancer Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies also present applications in breast cancer counselling and prevention. As reported by Shaik et al, (2015) women within the age group 30-50 are 3.704 more likely to have breast cancer, as found in our case (age group 35-50 years). In close comparison with our findings, age factor and the point of change at diagnosis has been reported at 50 years by Abdollabi et al, (2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies also present applications in breast cancer counselling and prevention. As reported by Shaik et al, (2015) women within the age group 30-50 are 3.704 more likely to have breast cancer, as found in our case (age group 35-50 years). In close comparison with our findings, age factor and the point of change at diagnosis has been reported at 50 years by Abdollabi et al, (2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Many studies have reported that methods of personalization or modelling applied for screening of breast cancer, although associated with its own benefits and harms, may make a vital change towards its early detection (Onega et al, 2014;Vilaprinyo et al, 2014). Many authors (Gail et al, 1989;Benichou et al, 1996;Tyrer et al, 2004;Shaik et al, 2015;Usman et al, 2014;Armero et al, 2016) have developed risk models employing different risk factors associated with the disease to estimate the risk of developing breast cancer of an individual. However a review of these models questioned their utility because of their low discrimination power (Anothaisintawee et al, 2012).…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%