Statistical Application and Cost Saving in a Dental Survey

Abstract

Objective: To effectively achieve a robust survey response rate in a timely manner, an alternative approach to survey distribution, informed by statistical modeling, was applied to efficiently and cost-effectively achieve the targeted rate of return. Design:A prospective environmental scan surveying adoption of health information technology utilization within their practices was undertaken in a national pool of dental professionals (N=8000) using an alternative method of sampling. The piloted approach to rate of cohort sampling targeted a response rate of 400 completed surveys from among randomly targeted eligible providers who were contacted using replicated subsampling leveraging mailed surveys. Methods:Two replicated subsample mailings (n=1000 surveys/mailings) were undertaken to project the true response rate and estimate the total number of surveys required to achieve the final target. Cost effectiveness and non-response bias analyses were performed. Results:The final mailing required approximately 24% fewer mailings compared to targeting of the entire cohort, with a final survey capture exceeding the expected target. An estimated $5000 in cost savings was projected by applying the alternative approach. Non-response analyses found no evidence of bias relative to demographics, practice demographics, or topically-related survey questions. Conclusion:The outcome of this pilot study suggests that this approach to survey studies will accomplish targeted enrollment in a cost effective manner. Future studies are needed to validate this approach in the context of other survey studies.

The use of behaviour management techniques amongst paediatric dentists working in the Arabian region: a cross-sectional survey study

“…Based on this estimate, a response rate of 27.4% of the estimated sample size was achieved by this survey study. This response rate is in line with other published dental and medical surveys showing a response rate between 20 and 32% (Cunningham et al 2015;Chyou et al 2017). Nevertheless, this study attracted participants from almost half of the countries in the Arabian region (10/21 countries, 45%).…”

Antibiotic prophylaxis habits in oral implant surgery among dentists in Italy: a cross-sectional survey

“…The large differences shown in the gender of participants may be related to the low rate of IAO female members. The response rate of 40% was quite low but it was retained satisfactory for a web survey [28]. Nevertheless, this fact could be a potential risk of bias because it is unknown whether the drop-outs are over-prescribing professionals or they are just uninterested in this topic.…”

Antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing habits in oral implant surgery in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional survey

“…Overall, the response rate of 24.9% was not high, but it was considered adequate for a web questionnaire [23]. While there was no certainty that all dentists, maxillofacial surgeons, periodontists and oral implantologists placing oral implants in the Netherlands were reached, it was considered that the participants in this study properly represented the target population.…”