2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Gene Regulatory Networks From Transcriptome Datasets

Abstract: Statistical and machine learning (ML)-based methods have recently advanced in construction of gene regulatory network (GRNs) based on high-throughput biological datasets. GRNs underlie almost all cellular phenomena; hence, comprehensive GRN maps are essential tools to elucidate gene function, thereby facilitating the identification and prioritization of candidate genes for functional analysis. High-throughput gene expression datasets have yielded various statistical and ML-based algorithms to infer causal rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To predict the order of action of transcriptional regulators, there are several stand-alone methods which infer GRNs given processed data rather than raw sequence reads. These methods use time series and processed multi-omics data to establish which genes influence the expression of others downstream, providing information about the system dynamics (Mochida et al, 2018). Specifically, they address two main questions: 1) What genes are altered and exhibit dynamic expression changes?, 2) How are these genes within the GRN regulating each other?…”
Section: Current Stand-alone Grn Inference Methods Do Not Fully Levermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To predict the order of action of transcriptional regulators, there are several stand-alone methods which infer GRNs given processed data rather than raw sequence reads. These methods use time series and processed multi-omics data to establish which genes influence the expression of others downstream, providing information about the system dynamics (Mochida et al, 2018). Specifically, they address two main questions: 1) What genes are altered and exhibit dynamic expression changes?, 2) How are these genes within the GRN regulating each other?…”
Section: Current Stand-alone Grn Inference Methods Do Not Fully Levermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategies to analyse time series discussed above are essentially statistical methods that aim at extracting patterns from time series without using prior knowledge. While machine learning and artificial intelligent approaches may be useful to detect patterns that humans might miss, and display remarkable successes in making predictions [84,40] it is highly challenging to extract useful information about underlying mechanisms from these models. Mechanistic models pursue the opposite approach.…”
Section: Mechanistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrating sufficient regulatory information as a graph, GRNs are essential tools for elucidating gene functions, interpreting biological processes, and prioritizing candidate genes for molecular regulators and biomarkers in complex diseases and traits analyses (Marbach et al, 2012). While highthroughput sequencing and other post-genomics technologies enable statistical and machine learning methods to reconstruct GRN, inferring gene regulatory relationships between a set of TFs and a set of potential gene targets through gene expression data is still far from being resolved in bioinformatics (Mochida et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With decades of efforts of inferring gene regulatory relationships from gene expression data, many machine learning and statistical methods have been proposed for reconstructing GRN (Mochida et al, 2018). Unsupervised methods dominate GRN inference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%