Abstract:This paper considers the analysis of Weibull distributed lifetime data observed under Type II progressive censoring with random removals, where the number of units removed at each failure time follows a binomial distribution. Maximum likelihood estimators of the parameters and their asymptotic variances are derived. The expected time required to complete the life test under this censoring scheme is investigated.
“…Moreover, this shows that these models are mixture models with mixing pmf g * m . This approach corresponds to progressive censoring models with random removals according to a probability distribution g * (see, for instance, Yuen and Tse 1996, Tse and Yuen 1998, Tse et al 2000, Tse and Xiang 2003, and Tse and Yang 2003. Such a scheme is called a simple adaptive progressive censoring scheme.…”
Section: Description Of the Model And Special Submodelsmentioning
“…Moreover, this shows that these models are mixture models with mixing pmf g * m . This approach corresponds to progressive censoring models with random removals according to a probability distribution g * (see, for instance, Yuen and Tse 1996, Tse and Yuen 1998, Tse et al 2000, Tse and Xiang 2003, and Tse and Yang 2003. Such a scheme is called a simple adaptive progressive censoring scheme.…”
Section: Description Of the Model And Special Submodelsmentioning
“…Thus, the number of removals cannot be prespecified and is random pending on the outcome of the experiment. Research works on progressive censoring schemes with this random removal scheme have been reported in Elsayed and Hao (2006), Young (2000), Tse et al (2000) and Wu and Chang (2003). These works studied parameter estimation and sampling design under type II censoring with progressive random removals at normal use conditions under various lifetime distributions.…”
Progressive type I censoring with random removal (PCRR), Step–stress, Accelerated life testing, Asymptotic variance, Variance (V)-optimality, Determinant (D)-optimality,
“…It seems more logical and natural to consider these p i as random variables for the risk of dropping at the i th stage. Perhaps, keeping a similar thought in mind, Yuen and Tse (1996) and Tse, Yang, and Yuen (2000) discussed progressive censoring scheme with binomial removal. Ashour and Afify (2007) have used PITI censoring scheme with binomial removals assuming that the exact value of the lifetimes of the units are observable.…”
The present article aims to point and interval estimation of the parameters of generalised exponential distribution (GED) under progressive interval type-I (PITI) censoring scheme with random removals. The considered censoring scheme is most useful in those cases where continuous examination is not possible. Maximum likelihood, expectationmaximization and Bayesian procedures have been developed for the estimation of parameters of the GED, based on a PITI censored sample. Real datasets have been considered to illustrate the applicability of the proposed work. Further, we have compared the performances of the proposed estimators under PITI censoring to that of the complete sample.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.