2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2805702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Analysis of the Effects of Heavyweight and Lightweight Methodologies on the Six-Pointed Star Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this study, the reason for adopting the questionnaire owes to its appropriateness in measuring the success of agile implementation. Examples of other similar studies are (16,17) . The survey questionnaire was divided into two parts: the first part comprised the questions related to respondent information while the other part comprised the project management factors, as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this study, the reason for adopting the questionnaire owes to its appropriateness in measuring the success of agile implementation. Examples of other similar studies are (16,17) . The survey questionnaire was divided into two parts: the first part comprised the questions related to respondent information while the other part comprised the project management factors, as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Next, the researchers statistically compared the effect of the traditional and agile methodologies using the six-point star model and explored the interrelationship between these factors. The outcome suggested that agile methodologies are sound for smaller tasks, while traditional methodologies are better for medium-and-large scale tasks (16). "AZ-Model", is introduced to develop the software on the basis of six-pointed star model (17).…”
Section: Scrum and Kanban Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature review approach is an effective way to determine the state-of-the-art work related to a research topic. Various other researcher adopts this method to explore the existing literature in different other software engineering domains [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Searching a suitable sample for the survey is not an easy task for which no exhaustive register for target population exists [9]. Hence the participants were evaluated by using the snowball technique [10] that is typically used in questionnaire study where members are difficult to locate [11].…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ince's model consists of the core phases of “change request,” “rejection,” “batch,” “implementation,” and “updating.” Each change request will forward to the change control board (CCB), and they will further take the final decisions after evaluating the change through all the phases of the model . This model covers different aspects of RCM but is missing the verification phase of the implemented changes . Therefore, it is challenging to verify whether a change implemented in the system is working accordingly or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%