2006
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis of the dynamics of antibody loss to a disease-causing agent: plague in natural populations of great gerbils as an example

Abstract: We propose a new stochastic framework for analysing the dynamics of the immunity response of wildlife hosts against a disease-causing agent. Our study is motivated by the need to analyse the monitoring time-series data covering the period from 1975 to 1995 on bacteriological and serological tests-samples from great gerbils being the main host of Yersinia pestis in Kazakhstan. Based on a four-state continuous-time Markov chain, we derive a generalized nonlinear mixed-effect model for analysing the serological t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…fleas [ 32 ], particularly X . gerbili minax [ 33 , 34 ], and Phlebotomus spp. phlebotomine sand flies [ 35 , 36 ], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fleas [ 32 ], particularly X . gerbili minax [ 33 , 34 ], and Phlebotomus spp. phlebotomine sand flies [ 35 , 36 ], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transmission to humans occurs occasionally through either contacting fleas that have fed on an infected animal (either a rodent or a secondary host) or eating or skinning infected animals (1). The records of human plague began in 1904, with most of the cases occurring before 1949, which was when plague monitoring and flea control began (8,10) in an effort to eliminate human plague outbreaks. The human plague cases are recorded annually and aggregated spatially, whereas the data on the gerbils and their fleas are recorded biannually.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abundance of great gerbils and their fleas, and the prevalence of wildlife plague were estimated at up to 78 sites in the PreBalkhash each spring (May and June) and fall (September and October) from 1949 to 1995. Fleas (primarily Xenopsylla gerbilli minax) (7,8) infesting the gerbils are the main plague vector (3). Plague infection is known to persist in the population only when the gerbil density exceeds a threshold (3,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these cases occurred prior to 1949, when plague monitoring and control began as part of Soviet-wide efforts, and antibiotics and insecticides became increasingly available [18,30]. Thus, a consistent and important climate forcing on sylvatic plague should be detectable in a statistical connection between climate and the independent human case data, allowing us to look for associations between climate fluctuations and human plague on scales much larger than previously considered, as well as connecting these associations with the long-term, large-scale behavior of the plague system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their spatial distribution appears to be limited by soils suitable for burrowing, while their temporal density fluctuations are mainly influenced by an interplay between density dependence (which operates around the burrow systems as they disperse mostly at the local scale, i.e., <15 km per generation), and variability in vegetation cover (which is synchronous over larger distances due to spatially autocorrelated precipitation and temperature) [ 15 , 16 ]. The main sylvatic (i.e., wildlife) plague transmission vectors are fleas [ 17 , 18 ], and increasing vector abundance is probably one of the reasons why moist, relatively warm spring conditions tend to increase the prevalence of plague in great gerbils [ 12 , 16 , 19 ]. Great gerbils usually have few visible symptoms of plague infection, and only moderate increases in mortality [ 12 , 20 ], and there seems to be a critical threshold of host population density necessary for plague to persist in an area [ 10 , 12 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%