2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis of sound level predictions in refracting and turbulent atmospheres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of the compound gamma distribution to realistic simulations of sound propagation through the atmosphere, using parabolic equation (PE) methods, demonstrate excellent agreement in a range of scenarios involving turbulent scattering, refraction, and ground reflections [12]. A similar PE study for outdoor sound propagation was also performed recently by Renterghem et al [20], although a direct comparison is not possible because the data were presented as sound levels (logarithms of ζ).…”
Section: Amplitude Modulationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Comparisons of the compound gamma distribution to realistic simulations of sound propagation through the atmosphere, using parabolic equation (PE) methods, demonstrate excellent agreement in a range of scenarios involving turbulent scattering, refraction, and ground reflections [12]. A similar PE study for outdoor sound propagation was also performed recently by Renterghem et al [20], although a direct comparison is not possible because the data were presented as sound levels (logarithms of ζ).…”
Section: Amplitude Modulationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…As example predictions, two moments were selected with a similar and strong upwardly refracting atmosphere, but with contrasting turbulent strengths. Simulations were performed with the Green's Function Parabolic Equation (GFPE) method, accounting for refraction by an effective sound speed profile and interaction with an acoustically hard ground (rocky terrain) [4]. In Figures 1 and 2, simulation results are shown for a wide range of 1/3 octave bands, both neglecting and correcting for turbulent scattering using the procedure presented in Section 2.…”
Section: Example Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting turbulent scattering in the acoustic shadow zone leads to unrealistic low sound pressure levels, or sound pressure level distributions get extremely long tails [4]. To avoid this, engineering models typically impose a fixed and frequency independent minimum level, relative to free field sound propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing semi-empirical aircraft noise prediction models use simplified atmospheric conditions to compute sound propagation, neglecting real weather conditions. Nonetheless, several studies by Browne et al [5] and Parry et al [6] have shown, that unsteady propagation effects have a significant impact on ground noise levels and need to be accounted for. Research by Binder [7] has dealt with the meteorological influence on sound propagation from large aircraft at high altitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%