2016 International Image Processing, Applications and Systems (IPAS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ipas.2016.7880119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis of SHVC encoded video

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig.5. the CTU can be split into MxM, M/2xM/2, M/3xM/3, and M/4xM/4 with M equal to 64 [28],depending on their respective distortion rates. Furthermore, each CU can be split into prediction units (PUs) {symetric: MxM, MxM/2, M/2xM, M/2xM/2, and asymetric: MxM/4, Mx3M/4, M/4xM, and 3M/4xM } then into transform units (TUs) [29].…”
Section: Statistical Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig.5. the CTU can be split into MxM, M/2xM/2, M/3xM/3, and M/4xM/4 with M equal to 64 [28],depending on their respective distortion rates. Furthermore, each CU can be split into prediction units (PUs) {symetric: MxM, MxM/2, M/2xM, M/2xM/2, and asymetric: MxM/4, Mx3M/4, M/4xM, and 3M/4xM } then into transform units (TUs) [29].…”
Section: Statistical Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%