2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis of planing hull motions and accelerations in irregular head sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon increasing / from 0.25 to 1.75, the results were considered to have sufficient effect, where the magnitude of the heave motion increased by 158% (Table 5); however, the pitch motion of the rounded hull catamaran subsequently increased up to 73.3% as / increased from 0.25 to 1.5. This possibly occurred due to the vertical motion at the bow region of the catamaran which became relatively more stiff in motions [38]. Similar to what was conducted by [4], it was generally concluded that the rounded hull catamaran was liable to have vigorous vertical motion responses; both of the heave and pitch motions within the range of 1.5≤ / ≤1.75.…”
Section: Effect Of Various Ratios Of Wavelengths ( / )supporting
confidence: 68%
“…Upon increasing / from 0.25 to 1.75, the results were considered to have sufficient effect, where the magnitude of the heave motion increased by 158% (Table 5); however, the pitch motion of the rounded hull catamaran subsequently increased up to 73.3% as / increased from 0.25 to 1.5. This possibly occurred due to the vertical motion at the bow region of the catamaran which became relatively more stiff in motions [38]. Similar to what was conducted by [4], it was generally concluded that the rounded hull catamaran was liable to have vigorous vertical motion responses; both of the heave and pitch motions within the range of 1.5≤ / ≤1.75.…”
Section: Effect Of Various Ratios Of Wavelengths ( / )supporting
confidence: 68%
“…According to Camilleri et al, (2018) [26], after compared the signals at several cut-off frequencies, the 10 Hz cut-off frequency recommended by Riley et al, (2014a) [13] is too low hence does not signify the peak acceleration rise accurately. In the most recent study conducted by Begovic et al, (2020) [23] and Begovic et al, (2016) [24] for model experiments conducted at UNINA, the cut-off frequency of 30 Hz also was chosen after observing extensive measured and simulated vertical accelerations results and found to be appropriate for removing vibration content without significantly affecting the rigid body dynamics. The effects of low pass filtering at frequencies 25 Hz, 33 Hz, and 58 Hz shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Slamming Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2003, Azcueta et al [13] conducted an analysis on the speed performance of a power boat, based on the free-surface RANS, and their method is suitable for predicting the severe responses of the vessel in waves, making it possible to predict the nonlinear motion of planing craft in rough sea conditions. In 2014, Begovic et al [14,15] conducted research on the responses of hull forms of a vessel in waves, and the response amplitudes in both regular and irregular waves were obtained and compared with the corresponding test data. The Weibull distribution was adopted to analyze the motion response of the model in irregular waves, especially in relation to the acceleration of the center of gravity (CG).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%