2015
DOI: 10.1515/crebss-2016-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Analysis of Causality between Capital Structure and Firm Profitability: Evidence from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract: This research is designed to examine the relationship between the capital structure and profitability of non-financial firms in Bosnia and Herzegovina during the ten years period, from 2003-2012. The goal is to prove the existence of the relationship between the firm’s capital structure choice and its profitability. The analysis is extended by including the debt structure and differentiating between the types of debt such as the long-term and the short-term ones. Canonical correlation and multiple regression a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These adverse features could be the reason of negative leverage-performance relation in developing economies as found by many of prior studies given in Table 1. (Hailu, 2015) Ethiopia - (Hedayatzadeh, 2015) Tehran - (Alipour & Pejman, 2015) Iran - (Boadi & Li, 2015) Ghana - (Vătavu, 2015) Romania - (Mule & Mukras, 2015) Kenya - (Nakhaei & Jafari, 2015) Tehran - (Nguyen & Nguyen, 2015) Vietnam - (Ramadan & Ramadan, 2015) Jordan - (Resić, Mangafić, & Peric, 2015) Bosnia and Herzegovina - (Rouf, 2015) Bangladesh - (Vithessonthi & Tongurai, 2015) Thailand -(Akinlo & Asaolu, 2012) Nigeria -(Ebaid, 2009) Egypt - (Chen, Chen, Liao, & Chen, 2009) Taiwan - (Memon, Bhutto, & Abbas, 2012) Pakistan - (Umar, Tanveer, Aslam, & Sajid, 2012) Pakistan -Abor, (2005) Ghana - (Hung, Albert, & Eddie, 2002) Hong Kong -However, it is argued that study of direct leverage-performance relation is not useful as it depends on various contingencies and moderating factors (Farooq, Ashraf, & Ahmad, 2014). Intensity and even direction of leverage-performance relation can change because of these contingencies factors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These adverse features could be the reason of negative leverage-performance relation in developing economies as found by many of prior studies given in Table 1. (Hailu, 2015) Ethiopia - (Hedayatzadeh, 2015) Tehran - (Alipour & Pejman, 2015) Iran - (Boadi & Li, 2015) Ghana - (Vătavu, 2015) Romania - (Mule & Mukras, 2015) Kenya - (Nakhaei & Jafari, 2015) Tehran - (Nguyen & Nguyen, 2015) Vietnam - (Ramadan & Ramadan, 2015) Jordan - (Resić, Mangafić, & Peric, 2015) Bosnia and Herzegovina - (Rouf, 2015) Bangladesh - (Vithessonthi & Tongurai, 2015) Thailand -(Akinlo & Asaolu, 2012) Nigeria -(Ebaid, 2009) Egypt - (Chen, Chen, Liao, & Chen, 2009) Taiwan - (Memon, Bhutto, & Abbas, 2012) Pakistan - (Umar, Tanveer, Aslam, & Sajid, 2012) Pakistan -Abor, (2005) Ghana - (Hung, Albert, & Eddie, 2002) Hong Kong -However, it is argued that study of direct leverage-performance relation is not useful as it depends on various contingencies and moderating factors (Farooq, Ashraf, & Ahmad, 2014). Intensity and even direction of leverage-performance relation can change because of these contingencies factors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%