1985
DOI: 10.2514/3.22809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis method for prediction of maximum inlet distortion

Abstract: " '. MAY 10 W 95 FLIGHT DYNAMICS LABORATORY AIR FORCE WRIGHT AERONAUTICAL LABORATORIES B AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND ' WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO 45433 S t 0 NVOTICE ,hen g;overnment drawings, specifications, or other 2ata are used for any purpose 3ther than in connection w.ith a definitely related ;overnment procurement operation, the 'nited States s;overrnenc thereby incurs no responsibility nor any obligation whatsoever; and the fact that the c7overnment ma,.; have formulated, furnished, or in any.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, in Phase (1) at low spillage (critical operating condition), a high frequency low amplitude oscillation of the normal shock exists. The inlet Mach number contours for Phase (1) inlet operation are shown in Figures (4) through (6). This is succeeded by Phase (2) in Figure (3), as the back pressure is further increased (subcritical operation), to a high frequency higher amplitude oscillation which is stable and dominated by the development of separation bubbles at the normal SWBL interaction on the isentropic spike.…”
Section: Flow Physics Of Inlet Buzzmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, in Phase (1) at low spillage (critical operating condition), a high frequency low amplitude oscillation of the normal shock exists. The inlet Mach number contours for Phase (1) inlet operation are shown in Figures (4) through (6). This is succeeded by Phase (2) in Figure (3), as the back pressure is further increased (subcritical operation), to a high frequency higher amplitude oscillation which is stable and dominated by the development of separation bubbles at the normal SWBL interaction on the isentropic spike.…”
Section: Flow Physics Of Inlet Buzzmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…That is because the process described from this analysis is fundamentally stochastic and not deterministic. There are however, in the body of literature, approximate statistical assessments of dynamic-distortion levels (5)(6)(7)(8) . This involves the measurement of the steady state total pressures and the RMS of the time varying total pressures using some or all of the rake probes at the Aerodynamic Interface Plane (AIP) station downstream inlet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%