1955
DOI: 10.1149/1.2429992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Analysis in Chemistry and the Chemical Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0
1

Year Published

1957
1957
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
106
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where s1 and s2 are the standard deviations for the group and for the strain. = 2.2 +lo30 which is > 0 The difference d is therefore significant a t a level of P = 0-05 (Bennett & Franklin, 1956 The other strains showed no significant difference from the mean for the group (Table 1). Thus, it was considered that strain 361 should be omitted from the group.…”
Section: Classification Of Mycobacteriu 259mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…where s1 and s2 are the standard deviations for the group and for the strain. = 2.2 +lo30 which is > 0 The difference d is therefore significant a t a level of P = 0-05 (Bennett & Franklin, 1956 The other strains showed no significant difference from the mean for the group (Table 1). Thus, it was considered that strain 361 should be omitted from the group.…”
Section: Classification Of Mycobacteriu 259mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In contrast, the unaware group completed a similar number of semantic and structural words (.33 and .28, respectively). Because self-reported test awareness is not an independent variable that was experimentally manipulated in the design, the questionnaire data were examined with a nonparametric test for comparison of two proportions (Bennett & Franklin, 1954). The analysis revealed that the test-aware subjects completed more semantically encoded words than nonsemantically encoded words (p < .01).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method, briefly, is to fmd a homogeneous variance by Cochran's test and then to use the square root of this variance to Studentize the range of sets of means to determine which means belong to the same population. The method is briefly illustrated in example 1 of section 5.53 of Bennett and Franklin (1954).…”
Section: Calculations Of Best Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This far exceeds the critical value of the Studentized range (CSR), 4. 74, in table 5.8 of Bennett and Franklin (1954) for n = 10 means and 40 d.f. for the standard deviation.…”
Section: Calculations Of Best Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%