2018
DOI: 10.1080/22243682.2018.1534607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis for orange G adsorption using kola nut shell activated carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of variance (ANOVA) can be employed in the analysis and validation of experimental result of many processes (Amadi et al, 2020). The significance and adequacy of the RSM model and input parameters were determined using the ANOVA, as shown in (Oguanobi et al, 2019;Emmanuel Chinonye et al, 2018). It is used to compare the range of the predicted responses at the design points to the mean prediction error (Ezedinma et al, 2021).…”
Section: Anova Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of variance (ANOVA) can be employed in the analysis and validation of experimental result of many processes (Amadi et al, 2020). The significance and adequacy of the RSM model and input parameters were determined using the ANOVA, as shown in (Oguanobi et al, 2019;Emmanuel Chinonye et al, 2018). It is used to compare the range of the predicted responses at the design points to the mean prediction error (Ezedinma et al, 2021).…”
Section: Anova Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal to noise ratio which is given as the value of the adequacy precision indicates that an adequate relationship of signal to noise ratio exists. An adequate precision ratio value greater than 4 indicates adequate model efficacy [38]. The results showed that the adequate precision ratio was 19.23.…”
Section: Anova Analysis and Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…From figure also, the optimum adsorption/removal of oil with unmodified groundnut shell adsorbents occurred at 100 mins with 71.72% removal. The difference in percentage removal was occasioned by the formation of monolayer on the surface of the adsorbents, thus the extent of removal of oil layer from the solution was then controlled by the rate of transport of the adsorbate species from the outer layer (pore sites) to the inner layer sites of the adsorbents, hence adsorbent with more microporous pores removes greater percentage of oil layer (adsorbate) according to Okpe et al [20]; Asadu et al [16]; Nwabanne et al [21]; Nwabanne et al [22]. It can be seen that the two adsorbents have demonstrated a good potential for the adsorption of oil from solution with alkaline activated groundnut shell showing a greater potential as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Timementioning
confidence: 99%