2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis and quality control for GPS fractional cycle bias and integer recovery clock estimation with raw and combined observation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the equivalent EWL/WL ambiguities can be obtained by means of parameter estimation and HMW linear combination. The equivalency for WL UPD from these two methods has been demonstrated in Cheng et al (2017). Therefore, the EWL/WL UPD is determined by code and phase observations itself and is not related to the precise clock and orbit products.…”
Section: Upd Estimation and Ppp Armentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, the equivalent EWL/WL ambiguities can be obtained by means of parameter estimation and HMW linear combination. The equivalency for WL UPD from these two methods has been demonstrated in Cheng et al (2017). Therefore, the EWL/WL UPD is determined by code and phase observations itself and is not related to the precise clock and orbit products.…”
Section: Upd Estimation and Ppp Armentioning
confidence: 98%
“…biases in the estimated UPDs/FCBs, IRCs or DSCs, will be absorbed into the estimated ambiguity terms, causing incorrect fixed-PPP solutions, or even failure in ambiguity fixing (Geng et al 2012). Cheng, et al (2017) proposed a quality control and reliability analysis procedure for their own FCB and IRC estimation to achieve reliable PPP-AR. Their detector for FCB was able to detect small phase outliers (larger than 0.4 cycles) and the undetectable outliers had insignificant impact on estimated FCBs.…”
Section: Products (Corrections)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is little literature that discusses the quality control procedures which can be used to check the integrity of PPP corrections, e.g. FCB/IRC estimation (Cheng et al 2017), orbit and clock corrections (El-Mowafy 2018), and the combined corrections of satellite clocks, ionospheric parameters and ambiguity solutions (Khodabandeh et al 2019). These quality control procedures can perform FDE and the analysis of different faults, as well as their impacts on the PPP solutions.…”
Section: Integrity Monitoring For Pppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gov/orms/goa) and Coulomb US Geological Survey. For this study, we used GIPSY OASIS II developed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) as single-receiver ambiguity resolution in kinematic positioning (function of time) or PPP (Webb and Zumberge 1996;Yi et al 2011Yi et al , 2012Yi et al , 2013cCheng et al 2017), RINEX 2.11 input file format, measurement types: dual frequency P code and phase; JPL's precise orbit and clock products in the ITRF08 reference system, cutoff 5 , average PDOP less than 2, IGS standards satellite antenna phase centre offset, antenna type in RINEX input file, tropospheric gradients (Bar-Sever et al 1998), second-order ionospheric delay (Kedar et al 2003).…”
Section: Gps Measurement Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%