Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2441776.2441813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical affect detection in collaborative chat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Humans usually express sentiment through multiple modalities such as 'facial expressions', 'voice' including both linguistic expressions and non-linguistic vocalizations and 'body language' [1], hence detecting sentiment using only 'text' is in itself a challenging task. However, natural language text is one of the most prevalent means of communication on E-Commerce and social-media platforms, hence efficient mining of sentiment from blog text is relevant in many contexts [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Humans usually express sentiment through multiple modalities such as 'facial expressions', 'voice' including both linguistic expressions and non-linguistic vocalizations and 'body language' [1], hence detecting sentiment using only 'text' is in itself a challenging task. However, natural language text is one of the most prevalent means of communication on E-Commerce and social-media platforms, hence efficient mining of sentiment from blog text is relevant in many contexts [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sentiment mining from text has been applied to a variety of useful and diverse applications in literature such as, understanding the sentiments of a geographically distributed team through their chat logs [2], analyzing the effect of negative opinions expressed in financial media text on potential investors [3], classifying and statistically summarizing the sentiment polarity expressed in online product reviews by customers [4], [5], discerning the emotions of students through sentiment analysis of the dialog between students and computerized tutoring system [6], mining of sentiment orientation from political blogs [7], [8], [9] etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been introduced by researchers for emotion annotation work. This gives binary labels for the given text (Alm et al, 2005), (Aman and Szpakowicz, 2007;Brooks et al, 2013), (Neviarouskaya et al, 2009), (Bollen et al, 2011), (Summa et al, 2016. only one annotation work exists for providing a real valued score as annotation for a given text (Strapparava and Mihalcea, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a task included in the SemEval-2007 shared task. Many methods devised for automatic emotion classification (Werbos, 1990), (Summa et al, 2016), (Mohammad, 2012), (Bollen et al, 2011), (Aman and Szpakowicz, 2007), (Brooks et al, 2013). However, only less amount work exists on emotion regression other than SemEval-2007 shared task (Strapparava andMihalcea, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotion detection in text is essentially a form of sentiment classification task based on finer-grained emotion categories. Automatic emotion detection has been applied in the domain of emails (Liu et al, 2003), customer reviews (Rubin, Stanton, & Liddy, 2004), children's stories (Alm et al, 2005), blog posts (Aman & Szpakowicz, 2007), newspaper headlines (Strapparava & Mihalcea, 2008), suicide notes (Pestian et al, 2012), and chat logs (Brooks et al, 2013). Early development of automatic emotion detectors focused only on the detection of Ekman's six basic emotions: happiness, surprise, sadness, fear, disgust, and anger (Alm et al, 2005;Aman & Szpakowicz, 2007;Liu et al, 2003;Strapparava & Mihalcea, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%