2005
DOI: 10.1002/aic.10542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stationary transversal hot zones in adiabatic packed‐bed reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
40
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(35 reference statements)
6
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7) couple bed and particle equations, so that they cannot be solved independently. When considering catalytic packed-bed reactors some authors neglect the transient terms in particle level with the assumption that transport phenomena occur much faster in the solid phase compared with that in the bed [60,61], e.g. the partial pressures in the particle are in dynamic equilibrium.…”
Section: Particle Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) couple bed and particle equations, so that they cannot be solved independently. When considering catalytic packed-bed reactors some authors neglect the transient terms in particle level with the assumption that transport phenomena occur much faster in the solid phase compared with that in the bed [60,61], e.g. the partial pressures in the particle are in dynamic equilibrium.…”
Section: Particle Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for realistic conditions Pe C\ [ Pe T\ and assuming that the ratio of the mass to heat dispersivities in the axial and transversal directions are equal (Pe C\ /Pe T\ ¼ Pe C /Pe T ), condition (6) can be satisfied only in an upstream propagating front (y m \ B), and in the case of stationary fronts (y m ¼ B) is reduced to Pe C \ Pe T , which coincides with the bifurcation condition derived for a simplified shallow reactor (RD) model. 32 Several reported studies focused on numerical analysis of transversal instabilities of planar fronts [25][26][27] : In one of the first studies of the subject, Balakotaiah et al 25 using a threevariable (two species and temperature) model with Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetics, simulated stationary (nonrotating) transversal patterns with…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As explained in the Introduction, using the classical mechanism, one can reason that (for a uniformly active bed with identical particles or uniform porosity, and constant physical properties) SPs cannot emanate from a homogeneous state. This is due to the fact that the temperature is the autocatalytic species (for the case of linear kinetics) and thermal diffusivity is always higher than mass or species diffusivity under realistic conditions (Balakotaiah et al, 1999a, b;Yakhnin and Menzinger, 2001;Viswanathan et al, 2005). While this reasoning is correct, it does not preclude the possibility of the unstable patterned states emerging from the (unstable) homogeneous branches gaining stability through secondary bifurcations (which happens as illustrated in this work).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Range Of Parameter Values For Pattern Formmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…first-order reaction) with pseudohomogeneous models or two-phase models with very small inter-phase gradients. Other authors (Viswanathan et al, 2005;Viswanathan and Luss, 2006) have reached a different conclusion and state that there is no qualitative difference between pseudohomogeneous models and two-phase models with respect to pattern formation.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Range Of Parameter Values For Pattern Formmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation