Abstract:Delirium is a manifestation of acute brain dysfunction that occurs in up to 80% of patients who are critically ill and is associated with higher mortality and long-term cognitive impairment (LTCI), which is akin to a dementia-like cognitive disability. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] This acquired cognitive impairment-critical illness brain injury-has important public health implications for both younger and older patients (the latter an increasingly larger proportion of the population), threatening the functional indep… Show more
“…Some experts have suggested that randomised trials of delirium should assess statins with both high and low lipophilic properties given the uncertainty about the effects on neuroinflammation. 8 However, both a lipophilic (ie, simvastatin) and non-lipophilic (ie, rosuvastatin) statin have been assessed in large randomised trials of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome with similar findings of no beneficial effects on mortality and ventilator-free days. 23,61 Rosuvastatin was used in the SAILS trial on the basis of its superior bioavailability, risk of hepatic dysfunction, and drug–drug interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from both animal and human studies 5–8 offer indirect evidence that neuroinflammation, with associated oxidative damage and apoptosis, is an important part of the pathophysiology of delirium in the intensive care unit and subsequent long-term cognitive impairment. Severe sepsis is an archetype of systemic inflammation, including neuroinflammation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Consequently, there is great interest in further evaluating the effect of statins on delirium in intensive care and subsequent cognitive function in randomised trials. 8,19–22 …”
Summary
Background
Delirium is common in mechanically ventilated patients and is associated with cognitive impairment lasting at least 1 year after hospital discharge. Preclinical and observational studies suggest that the use of statins might reduce delirium in intensive care. We assessed whether the pleiotropic effects of statins can reduce delirium in intensive care and decrease subsequent cognitive impairment in a randomised controlled trial.
Methods
We did this ancillary study within the SAILS trial, a randomised controlled trial assessing mortality and ventilator-free days for rosuvastatin versus placebo for patients with sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. This study was done at 35 hospitals in the USA. Patients were randomly assigned in permuted blocks of eight and stratified by hospital to receive either rosuvastatin (40 mg loading dose and then 20 mg daily until the earliest of 3 days after discharge from intensive care, study day 28, or death) or placebo. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. Delirium was assessed with the validated Confusion Assessment Method for intensive care. Cognitive function was assessed with tests for executive function, language, verbal reasoning and concept formation, and working, immediate, and delayed memory. We defined cognitive impairment as having one of these domains at least two SDs below population norms or at least two domains at least 1·5 SDs below norms. The primary endpoint was daily delirium status in intensive care up to 28 days in the intention-to-treat population and secondary endpoints were cognitive function at 6 months and 12 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00979121 and NCT00719446).
Findings
272 patients were assessed for delirium daily in intensive care. The mean proportion of days with delirium was 34% (SD 30%) in the rosuvastatin group versus 31% (29%) in the placebo group; hazard ratio 1·14, 95% CI 0·92–1·41, p=0·22. At 6 months, 19 (36%) of 53 patients in the rosuvastatin group versus 29 (38%) of 77 in the placebo group had cognitive impairment, with no significant difference between groups (treatment effect 0·93, 95% CI 0·39–2·22; p=0·87). At 12 months, 20 (30%) of 67 patients versus 23 (28%) of 81 patients had cognitive impairment, with no significant difference between groups (treatment effect 1·1, 95% CI 0·5–2·6; p=0·82).
Interpretation
Most patients had delirium, with around a third of survivors having cognitive impairment over 1 year of follow-up. Despite encouraging preclinical and observational studies, this trial shows no benefit of rosuvastatin in reducing delirium in intensive care or cognitive impairment during 12 months of follow-up although the study was not powered for superiority. Thus, there is continued need to evaluate interventions aimed at attenuating intensive care and post-intensive-care cognitive impairments commonly observed in this population.
“…Some experts have suggested that randomised trials of delirium should assess statins with both high and low lipophilic properties given the uncertainty about the effects on neuroinflammation. 8 However, both a lipophilic (ie, simvastatin) and non-lipophilic (ie, rosuvastatin) statin have been assessed in large randomised trials of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome with similar findings of no beneficial effects on mortality and ventilator-free days. 23,61 Rosuvastatin was used in the SAILS trial on the basis of its superior bioavailability, risk of hepatic dysfunction, and drug–drug interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from both animal and human studies 5–8 offer indirect evidence that neuroinflammation, with associated oxidative damage and apoptosis, is an important part of the pathophysiology of delirium in the intensive care unit and subsequent long-term cognitive impairment. Severe sepsis is an archetype of systemic inflammation, including neuroinflammation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Consequently, there is great interest in further evaluating the effect of statins on delirium in intensive care and subsequent cognitive function in randomised trials. 8,19–22 …”
Summary
Background
Delirium is common in mechanically ventilated patients and is associated with cognitive impairment lasting at least 1 year after hospital discharge. Preclinical and observational studies suggest that the use of statins might reduce delirium in intensive care. We assessed whether the pleiotropic effects of statins can reduce delirium in intensive care and decrease subsequent cognitive impairment in a randomised controlled trial.
Methods
We did this ancillary study within the SAILS trial, a randomised controlled trial assessing mortality and ventilator-free days for rosuvastatin versus placebo for patients with sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. This study was done at 35 hospitals in the USA. Patients were randomly assigned in permuted blocks of eight and stratified by hospital to receive either rosuvastatin (40 mg loading dose and then 20 mg daily until the earliest of 3 days after discharge from intensive care, study day 28, or death) or placebo. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. Delirium was assessed with the validated Confusion Assessment Method for intensive care. Cognitive function was assessed with tests for executive function, language, verbal reasoning and concept formation, and working, immediate, and delayed memory. We defined cognitive impairment as having one of these domains at least two SDs below population norms or at least two domains at least 1·5 SDs below norms. The primary endpoint was daily delirium status in intensive care up to 28 days in the intention-to-treat population and secondary endpoints were cognitive function at 6 months and 12 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00979121 and NCT00719446).
Findings
272 patients were assessed for delirium daily in intensive care. The mean proportion of days with delirium was 34% (SD 30%) in the rosuvastatin group versus 31% (29%) in the placebo group; hazard ratio 1·14, 95% CI 0·92–1·41, p=0·22. At 6 months, 19 (36%) of 53 patients in the rosuvastatin group versus 29 (38%) of 77 in the placebo group had cognitive impairment, with no significant difference between groups (treatment effect 0·93, 95% CI 0·39–2·22; p=0·87). At 12 months, 20 (30%) of 67 patients versus 23 (28%) of 81 patients had cognitive impairment, with no significant difference between groups (treatment effect 1·1, 95% CI 0·5–2·6; p=0·82).
Interpretation
Most patients had delirium, with around a third of survivors having cognitive impairment over 1 year of follow-up. Despite encouraging preclinical and observational studies, this trial shows no benefit of rosuvastatin in reducing delirium in intensive care or cognitive impairment during 12 months of follow-up although the study was not powered for superiority. Thus, there is continued need to evaluate interventions aimed at attenuating intensive care and post-intensive-care cognitive impairments commonly observed in this population.
“…Statins have anti-inflammatory (9, 10), endothelial function-enhancing (11, 12), and anticoagulant effects (13, 14) that may interrupt the pathologic events thought to lead to delirium during critical illness. These pleiotropic effects make statins promising candidates for the treatment of delirium during critical illness (15) since they might interrupt the neuroinflammatory cascade hypothesized to contribute to delirium (16, 17). In addition, evidence suggests that treatment of acutely ill patients with statins can reduce inflammation (18–20) whereas abrupt cessation of statins may cause rebound inflammation (21), leading to adverse cardiovascular outcomes (22–25).…”
Objective
Since statins have pleiotropic effects on inflammation and coagulation that may interrupt delirium pathogenesis, we tested the hypotheses that statin exposure is associated with reduced delirium during critical illness whereas discontinuation of statin therapy is associated with increased delirium.
Design
Multicenter, prospective cohort study.
Setting
Medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) in two large tertiary care hospitals in the United States.
Patients
Patients with acute respiratory failure or shock.
Measurements and Main Results
We measured statin exposure prior to hospitalization and daily during the ICU stay, and we assessed patients for delirium twice daily using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. Of 763 patients included, whose median [interquartile range] age was 61 [51–70] years and APACHE II was 25 [19–31], 257 (34%) were prehospital statin users and 197 (26%) were ICU statin users. Overall, 588 (77%) developed delirium. After adjusting for covariates, ICU statin use was associated with reduced delirium (p < 0.01). This association was modified by sepsis and study day; e.g., statin use was associated with reduced delirium among patients with sepsis on study day 1 (odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10–0.49) but not among patients without sepsis on day 1 (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.46–1.84) or among those with sepsis later, e.g., on day 13 (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.35–1.41). Prehospital statin use was not associated with delirium (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.44–1.66; p = 0.18), yet the longer a prehospital statin user’s statin was held in the ICU, the higher the odds of delirium (overall p < 0.001 with the OR depending on sepsis status and study day due to significant interactions).
Conclusions
In critically ill patients, ICU statin use was associated with reduced delirium, especially early during sepsis; discontinuation of a previously used statin was associated with increased delirium.
“…65 A role for statins in both the treatment and the prevention of delirium in critically ill patients has been postulated. 125,126 With proinflammatory cytokines involved in the pathophysiology of delirium, future studies may examine the role of anti-inflammatory medications as adjuvant agents in combination with other medications.…”
Context
Delirium is a highly prevalent complication in patients in palliative care settings, especially in the end-of-life context.
Objectives
To review the current evidence base for treating episodes of delirium in palliative care settings and propose a framework for future development.
Methods
We combined multidisciplinary input from delirium researchers and other purposely selected stakeholders at an international delirium study planning meeting. This was supplemented by a literature search of multiple databases and relevant reference lists to identify studies regarding therapeutic interventions for delirium.
Results
The context of delirium management in palliative care is highly variable. The standard management of a delirium episode includes the investigation of precipitating and aggravating factors followed by symptomatic treatment with drug therapy. However, the intensity of this management depends on illness trajectory and goals of care in addition to the local availability of both investigative modalities and therapeutic interventions. Pharmacologically, haloperidol remains the practice standard by consensus for symptomatic control. Dosing schedules are derived from expert opinion and various clinical practice guidelines as evidence-based data from palliative care settings are limited. The commonly used pharmacologic interventions for delirium in this population warrant evaluation in clinical trials to examine dosing and titration regimens, different routes of administration, and safety and efficacy compared with placebo.
Conclusion
Delirium treatment is multidimensional and includes the identification of precipitating and aggravating factors. For symptomatic management, haloperidol remains the practice standard. Further high-quality collaborative research investigating the appropriate treatment of this complex syndrome is needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.