2013
DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2013.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statin use and risk of prostate cancer and high-grade prostate cancer: results from the REDUCE study

Abstract: Among men with a negative baseline biopsy and follow-up biopsies largely independent of PSA, statins were not associated with cancer or high-grade cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
44
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we observed that statin users had lower PSA levels than nonusers in this study. Randomized trials conducting PSA-independent biopsies at regular intervals may circumvent this potential source of detection bias, and secondary analysis of one such trial reported a null association between statin use and high-grade prostate cancer (24). However, given that trial participants are selected based upon specific eligibility criteria and do not represent a population-based sample, findings from secondary analyses of trials (21,24) may differ from findings reported by population-based studies (19,20), including our own.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, we observed that statin users had lower PSA levels than nonusers in this study. Randomized trials conducting PSA-independent biopsies at regular intervals may circumvent this potential source of detection bias, and secondary analysis of one such trial reported a null association between statin use and high-grade prostate cancer (24). However, given that trial participants are selected based upon specific eligibility criteria and do not represent a population-based sample, findings from secondary analyses of trials (21,24) may differ from findings reported by population-based studies (19,20), including our own.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Randomized trials conducting PSA-independent biopsies at regular intervals may circumvent this potential source of detection bias, and secondary analysis of one such trial reported a null association between statin use and high-grade prostate cancer (24). However, given that trial participants are selected based upon specific eligibility criteria and do not represent a population-based sample, findings from secondary analyses of trials (21,24) may differ from findings reported by population-based studies (19,20), including our own. As such, although the potential for screening-related detection biases should be considered, our findings, in addition to those from populations with different PSA screening frequencies (25), support a true association between statin use and prostate cancer aggressiveness.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Herein, we found the link between CAD and PCa risk was unchanged after adjusting for hypercholesterolemia. Furthermore, after adjusting for statins, which some studies suggested are associated with reduced PCa risk, the results remained unchanged, though, in prior analyses from REDUCE, statins were unrelated to PCa risk (22). However, hypercholesterolemia is a crude measure of cholesterol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Despite these promising data, other observational studies found no link between statin use and total prostate cancer risk, including a secondary analysis of a randomized trial in men with a negative prostate biopsy who underwent repeat biopsies at 2 years and 4 years 77 , in addition to several cohort studies 5,8,9,11,7882 . Overall, individual case-control and cohort studies had conflicting findings, but the most recent meta-analysis of these studies from 2012 reported a significant 7% reduction in risk of total prostate cancer in statin users in comparison with nonusers ( P = 0.03) 83 .…”
Section: Epidemiological Evidencementioning
confidence: 98%