2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71734-0_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statically Checking Conventionality of Array Objects in JavaScript

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we exploit the increase in precision in the number domain to develop a string domain that can capture precise information on array index ranges. This domain is a part of a static conventionality analysis for JavaScript arrays that was introduced in [15] which gives more precise information about array index ranges. The abstract string domain is a constant propagation domain similar to the string domain in TAJS except that it is extended with integer intervals as follows.…”
Section: Abstract String Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we exploit the increase in precision in the number domain to develop a string domain that can capture precise information on array index ranges. This domain is a part of a static conventionality analysis for JavaScript arrays that was introduced in [15] which gives more precise information about array index ranges. The abstract string domain is a constant propagation domain similar to the string domain in TAJS except that it is extended with integer intervals as follows.…”
Section: Abstract String Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous example, the element A[0, 5] will be mapped to a dimension that represents the possible values for indexes from 0 to 5. The element A [10,15] will be mapped to another dimension that represents the possible values for indexes from 10 to 15.…”
Section: Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%