2005
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0680(2005)10:1(22)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static Soil–Structure Interaction Effects in Seismic-Isolated Bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1995, Zayas et al [6] performed a finite element analysis of the seismic response of industrial storage tanks with FPB, and the results showed that FPB can not only reduce the risk of leakage or damage to the structure during an earthquake but also make the structure design more economical and reasonable. Dicleli [7,8] and Ingham [9] investigated the use of FPB for bridges in terms of strengthening techniques and economic benefits. The results showed that FPB can effectively attenuate seismic effects and is less costly than conventional structural ring springs, which were initially common in various mechanical components, such as artillery automatic floaters, slab casters buffers, and machine gun launchers [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1995, Zayas et al [6] performed a finite element analysis of the seismic response of industrial storage tanks with FPB, and the results showed that FPB can not only reduce the risk of leakage or damage to the structure during an earthquake but also make the structure design more economical and reasonable. Dicleli [7,8] and Ingham [9] investigated the use of FPB for bridges in terms of strengthening techniques and economic benefits. The results showed that FPB can effectively attenuate seismic effects and is less costly than conventional structural ring springs, which were initially common in various mechanical components, such as artillery automatic floaters, slab casters buffers, and machine gun launchers [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piles are often used in groups and the load transfer mechanism in group piles is generally different from that of a single pile due to the pile-soil and pile-pile interaction effects which has been described by previous researchers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Previous studies indicated that the interaction between soil and structure has a significant effect on the responses of foundation and structure [8][9][10][11]. The pile-soil-pile interaction is a complicated phenomenon which can be significantly influenced by many factors, such as the load-deformation properties and the shear strength characteristics of both pile and surrounding soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, the general concession between engineers and researchers was that the soil structure interaction (SSI) effects are beneficial to the response of structures because SSI provides additional flexibility and damping to the structures or naturally isolates them from the shaking ground [7]. In the field of seismic behavior of isolated structures, many studies [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] have investigated the effect of SSI on continuous bridges isolated with rubber bearings. Considering the previous studies on SSI effects on base isolated structure, it is clear that very limited research has been done on SSI effect on seismic behavior of multi-degree-freedom structure isolated with FPS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%