2008
DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2008-00203-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static properties of trapped bose gases at finite temperature: Thomas-Fermi limit

Abstract: We rely on a variational approach to derive a set of equations governing a trapped self-interacting Bose gas at finite temperature. In this work, we analyze the static situation both at zero and finite temperature in the Thomas-Fermi limit. We derive simple analytic expressions for the condensate properties at finite temperature. The noncondensate and anomalous density profiles are also analyzed in terms of the condensate fraction. The results are quite encouraging owing to the simplicity of the formalism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, the Gaussian shape of the noncondensate cloud is preserved due to the uniform character of the condensate repulsive mean field adopted. In a recent paper [15], the authors indicate that such a modified thermal cloud profile tends to be more uniform to large and dense clouds.…”
Section: Analytical Hartree-fockmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our case, the Gaussian shape of the noncondensate cloud is preserved due to the uniform character of the condensate repulsive mean field adopted. In a recent paper [15], the authors indicate that such a modified thermal cloud profile tends to be more uniform to large and dense clouds.…”
Section: Analytical Hartree-fockmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To our knowledge, no other work deals with the quantity R 5 /N 0 × N 0 /N, which is a relevant quantity within the Thomas-Fermi (TF) approximation, and neither do they produce analytical analysis for the problem. In fact, most of the existing work deals with numerical corrections to these individual quantities [11] or rely on analytical approaches still based on the T = 0 regime, neglecting the thermal atoms [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, which shows clearly that neglecting m Δ does not necessarily mean neglecting n Δ and therefore omitting the anomalous pressure does not mean neglecting the thermal pressure [63]. Such feature we shall adopt in what follow.…”
Section: Breathing Modes Of the Anomalous Densitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The density profiles that we have just determined as functions of the temperature are seen to keep the same overall structures, which are not altered for high atom numbers until the TF regime is reached. This is to be contrasted with [15], where in particularñ(r) andm(r) do not present any particular structure near the origin. We believe that the absence of this structure is an artefact of the finite-temperature TF approximation used there.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Moreover, in a recent work [15], it was found that for high atom numbers, the non-condensate density and the anomalous density have no special structure near the centre of the trap which seems compatible with the experiment [10] (at least for the thermal cloud) but which contradicts the results of [8]. We must recall however that the generalized Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (GHFB) numerical calculations performed in the latter reference consider only small atom numbers; hence, there is a necessity to perform the same calculations for high atom numbers in order to see to what extent the predictions of the GHFB approximation remain true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%