2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static load test on progressive collapse resistance of fully assembled precast concrete frame structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 shows a typical detailing of the RC sub-assemblage reference test specimens considered in this study. A total of twenty-nine sub-assemblage reference test specimens with three different scales were selected from twelve different experimental investigations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Table 1 shows the dimensions, reinforcement ratios, and material properties of the scaled RC sub-assemblage specimens.…”
Section: Details Of Sub-assemblage Test Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 shows a typical detailing of the RC sub-assemblage reference test specimens considered in this study. A total of twenty-nine sub-assemblage reference test specimens with three different scales were selected from twelve different experimental investigations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Table 1 shows the dimensions, reinforcement ratios, and material properties of the scaled RC sub-assemblage specimens.…”
Section: Details Of Sub-assemblage Test Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to typical RC framed structures, various structural systems and components, such as precast construction and pre-stressed concrete structures, receive less attention in the analysis of progressive collapse. The knowledge in this domain is restricted to a few studies, so more attention should be devoted to the progressive collapse analysis of such systems [10,11]. To explore the RC sub-assemblage structural behavior of, and the development of, alternate load path mechanisms during progressive collapse, Ahmadi et al [12] tested scaled RC beam-column sub-assemblages in a quasi-static loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e uniaxial stress-strain relationship of concrete prescribed in GB50010-2010 [30] was employed to simulate the constitutive relationship of the concrete component (Figure 14 Advances in Civil Engineering regarded as an elastic orthotropic material with a reduced elastic modulus. e stiffness degradation is assumed to occur in the softening response in both compression and tension [36]. In this study, the corresponding parameters were defined as follows: the shape parameter was K c � 0.6667, the dilation angle was ψ � 30 ∘ , the plastic potential eccentricity was ε � 0.1, and the ratio of the biaxial stress to uniaxial stress was σ b0 /σ c0 � 1.16 according to the study by Genikomsou and Polak [37].…”
Section: Fe Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted at this point that the columns' linear-elastic behaviour was supported by the lack of damage to these elements during the test. The ABAQUS concrete damage plasticity model [12,[41][42][43][44][45] was used for the concrete in the slabs, including concrete cracking and crushing for tensile and compressive behaviour, respectively. Compression was defined from Eurocode 2 [40] considering the mechanical parameters given in Table 1.…”
Section: Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%