Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/chicc.2014.6896282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static error elimination algorithm for PMSM predictive current control

Abstract: This paper presents an algorithm to eliminate the static error of PMSM predictive current control when the model in controller has parameter mismatches with real system. The algorithm mainly applies to cases where the controller inductance is smaller and the controller flux is not accurate. The static error caused by smaller inductance is eliminated by introducing error integration in d axis current control. The error caused by flux inaccuracy is eliminated by dynamically adjusting the flux parameter according… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the parameter identification algorithms are usually complex and time-consuming, so when they are executed in each switching frequency, the calculation delay problem gets unexpectedly exacerbated. Papers [19] and [20] use current errors to estimate the real-time flux so as to remove the d-axis current static errors, but integrators have to be adopted, lowering the system bandwidth and dynamics. In addition, another interesting solution to the parameter mismatch issue is to construct the perturbation observers that can be integrated into the prediction plant model [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the parameter identification algorithms are usually complex and time-consuming, so when they are executed in each switching frequency, the calculation delay problem gets unexpectedly exacerbated. Papers [19] and [20] use current errors to estimate the real-time flux so as to remove the d-axis current static errors, but integrators have to be adopted, lowering the system bandwidth and dynamics. In addition, another interesting solution to the parameter mismatch issue is to construct the perturbation observers that can be integrated into the prediction plant model [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an integral can be introduced for error compensation. In [16], the current error integral is introduced, and the parameter of the flux linkage is dynamically adjusted to cancel the error. In [17], a new method that introduces the current error into the control signal through an integral sliding mode term for error compensation is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this control method is an open loop control. References [7][8][9][10] have proposed different methods to improve the steadystate performance of deadbeat predictive control, but those methods have limited effect on some motors with strong nonlinearities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%