2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.10.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static–dynamic multi-scale structural damage identification in a multi-objective framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the IARR method, it is found that the magnitudes of IARR 7 , IARR 8 , IARR 9 and IARR 10 related to the damaged element are much larger than Note: The data represent the constraint deviation levels expressed by equation (12). ARR: analytical redundancy reduction; IARR: improved analytical redundancy reduction.…”
Section: Damage Assessment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the IARR method, it is found that the magnitudes of IARR 7 , IARR 8 , IARR 9 and IARR 10 related to the damaged element are much larger than Note: The data represent the constraint deviation levels expressed by equation (12). ARR: analytical redundancy reduction; IARR: improved analytical redundancy reduction.…”
Section: Damage Assessment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In general, static and dynamic measurements of a structure are adopted as objective responses for damage assessment. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Static testing can straightly reflect the current stiffness or resistance ability of the structure and thus is often used for the evaluation of bridges. Displacements or deflections are first options, and a model updating procedure or parametric study 7 can be employed for assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, there are a number of works [20][21][22] that formulated the structural damage detection as multiobjective optimization problems having a number of objectives evaluated from the differences between measured and theoretically computed vibration characteristics.…”
Section: Advances In Mechanical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous works employed the damage detection in the beams as test problems [5,6,22]; however, the beams are divided into only a few number of elements, not more than 10 elements, in their studies. With a small number of divided elements, there could be some numerical errors in the objective calculation by numerical methods.…”
Section: Advances In Mechanical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%