2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
128
2
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
128
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…To simulate the average masticator force in a natural loading on the implant, forces of 17.1 N, 114.6 N, and 23.4 N were applied respectively in lingual, axial, and mesiodistal directions [26]. In general, torque was generated by using two equal forces in magnitude, opposite in direction, applied to two opposite points on the diameter of the implant head.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate the average masticator force in a natural loading on the implant, forces of 17.1 N, 114.6 N, and 23.4 N were applied respectively in lingual, axial, and mesiodistal directions [26]. In general, torque was generated by using two equal forces in magnitude, opposite in direction, applied to two opposite points on the diameter of the implant head.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young's module is on high level which is 220 GPa [7]. The material is mainly valued for its anti-corrosive properties and no negative impact on the human body.…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method works well in the very first step of teeth replenishing -treatment planning. Finite Elements Method supports the initial evaluation of the treatment success level, before the operation on the patient [7]. At the computerisation stage it is possible to eliminate the possible problems related to choosing the wrong implant geometry or unsuitable prosthetic crown overhangs size and shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain an additional comparison with the physical test results and numerical analysis, a model proposed in [4,6] were utilized. According to Gibson and Ashby, equation can be rewritten to calculate the effective elastic modulus as follows:…”
Section: Correlation Of Published Empirical Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FEA method is common in the biomechanical study to predict implant performance. Prediction of macroscopic mechanical properties of porous structures using (FEA) can reduce amount of experimental works needed in tailoring special properties of porous implants hence allows researchers to predict stress distribution in the contact area of the implants with the bones by solving structural mechanics problems using numerical approximation [4]. Recent study shows that the effective elastic modulus of porous structure of CoCr biomedical grade alloy produced by selective laser melting (SLM) can be predicted using FEA [5] to some extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%