2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijvd.2016.082384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static coupling between detached-eddy simulations and vehicle dynamic simulations of a generic road vehicle model with different rear configurations in unsteady crosswind

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though later parametric studies also highlight the high sensitivity of the CoG [17,[31][32][33] and the importance of the CP position relative to the NSP [33], little is still known on the influence of suspension and other vehicle properties on crosswind sensitivity. The desired positioning of CoG can conflict with other vehicle attributes and changes to the suspension kinematics and compliance might be more realistic improvements for crosswind stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though later parametric studies also highlight the high sensitivity of the CoG [17,[31][32][33] and the importance of the CP position relative to the NSP [33], little is still known on the influence of suspension and other vehicle properties on crosswind sensitivity. The desired positioning of CoG can conflict with other vehicle attributes and changes to the suspension kinematics and compliance might be more realistic improvements for crosswind stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al (2017aHuang et al ( , 2017b investigate the necessity to conduct the two-way coupling with a 3-DOF vehicle model in crosswind. Favre et al (2016) use the 12-DOF vehicle dynamic model coupled with detached eddy simulation. However, the existing research on vehicle crosswind stability is based on computational fluid dynamics and vehicle dynamics consisting of a set of mathematical equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trapeze-shaped deterministic crosswind profiles, which have cosine inlet and exit with a flat top, were used in the simulations. The trapeze-shaped crosswind profile is based on the experimental and numerical crosswind studies of Winkler et al, 20 Chadwick et al 42 and Favre et al 43 Additionally, the trapeze-shaped profile of crosswind gusts was classified as a realistic crosswind profile that counts for almost every third crosswind gust in the experimental crosswind study of Wojciak. 12 Four different crosswind reduced frequencies, k = 4.2, 2.1, 1.3 and 0.9, were used in the simulations, giving four different wavelengths of crosswinds, λ cw /L vehicle = 1.5, 3, 5, 7, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%