1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.54.9267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and dynamic response of cluster glass inLa0.5Sr0.5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

22
126
3
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
22
126
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…͑1͒ yields T g Ϸ 224.6 K, zv Ϸ 2.85, and 0 Ϸ 9.18ϫ 10 −8 s. A similar procedure using the Љ͑T͒ data was also employed for the case of the peak at ϳ170 K, yielding T g Ϸ 137.5 K, zv Ϸ 3.12, and 0 Ϸ 9.8ϫ 10 −6 s. In both these cases, the obtained values of 0 are much larger than typical values for a conventional spin glass system ͑ 0 ϳ 10 −13 s͒, 11 but in good agreement to values found in cluster glass ͑CG͒ systems ͑ 0 ϳ 10 −7 -10 −9 s͒. 12,13 This quantitative analysis indicates that the magnetic phase of the LuFe 2 O 4 system can be viewed as arising due to an assembly of clusters whose sizes and distribution vary with temperature. The difference in 0 for the two cases at ϳ225 K ͑ 0 Ϸ 9.18ϫ 10 −8 s͒ and ϳ170 K ͑ 0 Ϸ 9.8ϫ 10 −6 s͒ clearly suggests a considerable difference in the size and distribution of clusters at these temperatures with the tendency of the average cluster size to increase as the temperature is lowered resulting in much larger relaxation times.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…͑1͒ yields T g Ϸ 224.6 K, zv Ϸ 2.85, and 0 Ϸ 9.18ϫ 10 −8 s. A similar procedure using the Љ͑T͒ data was also employed for the case of the peak at ϳ170 K, yielding T g Ϸ 137.5 K, zv Ϸ 3.12, and 0 Ϸ 9.8ϫ 10 −6 s. In both these cases, the obtained values of 0 are much larger than typical values for a conventional spin glass system ͑ 0 ϳ 10 −13 s͒, 11 but in good agreement to values found in cluster glass ͑CG͒ systems ͑ 0 ϳ 10 −7 -10 −9 s͒. 12,13 This quantitative analysis indicates that the magnetic phase of the LuFe 2 O 4 system can be viewed as arising due to an assembly of clusters whose sizes and distribution vary with temperature. The difference in 0 for the two cases at ϳ225 K ͑ 0 Ϸ 9.18ϫ 10 −8 s͒ and ϳ170 K ͑ 0 Ϸ 9.8ϫ 10 −6 s͒ clearly suggests a considerable difference in the size and distribution of clusters at these temperatures with the tendency of the average cluster size to increase as the temperature is lowered resulting in much larger relaxation times.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…[10][11][12][13] The temperature dependences of the real ͓ Ј͑T͔͒ and imaginary ͓ Љ͑T͔͒ components of the susceptibility of LuFe 2 O 4 were measured at different fixed frequencies ranging from 10 Hz to 10 kHz. In these measurements, the amplitude of the ac field was kept constant at h ac = 10 Oe.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cluster-glass structure has already been observed in several manganites [18,5,17] and related compounds [19,20]. Such a structure corresponds to microscopic magnetic moments which align ferromagnetically within finite-size clusters, with a random orientation of the cluster moments with respect to each other.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The difference between the ZFC and FC magnetizations is much higher in the cluster-glass phase (Samples 1 and 2) compared to the spin-glass phase (Sample 3), reflecting the presence of FM order within the clusters. 11 Isothermal M vs. H curves measured at 10 K are plotted in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Magnetic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%