2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and dynamic nonlinear response of masonry walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, especially in the cases in which the out of plane mechanisms can be considered absent [4], the role of the in plane behavior of masonry elements (piers and spandrels) and their interaction with the horizontal structural elements is a key one [5,6]. Given the importance of the masonry heritage and in view of its rehabilitation, efficient and consistent tools are needed [7], especially constitutive models able to describe the complex patterns of cracks after static and dynamic actions [8,9,10]. Several constitutive models have been proposed in the last decades to describe the behaviour of masonry, and among them a preminent role can be assigned to the No-Tension (NT) model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, especially in the cases in which the out of plane mechanisms can be considered absent [4], the role of the in plane behavior of masonry elements (piers and spandrels) and their interaction with the horizontal structural elements is a key one [5,6]. Given the importance of the masonry heritage and in view of its rehabilitation, efficient and consistent tools are needed [7], especially constitutive models able to describe the complex patterns of cracks after static and dynamic actions [8,9,10]. Several constitutive models have been proposed in the last decades to describe the behaviour of masonry, and among them a preminent role can be assigned to the No-Tension (NT) model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work addresses a generalization of the mixed membrane eight‐node quadrilateral finite element proposed in our previous work to the nonlinear analysis of in‐plane loaded masonry walls. Although the formulation is of general validity with respect to masonry constitutive law, provided a 2D stress‐strain relationship is considered, the nonlocal damage‐plastic model recently proposed by Gatta et al is adopted. The element derivation is based on a Hu‐Washizu–type formulation, assuming displacement, strain, and stress fields as independent variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, it is worth mentioning discrete element approaches, 1-6 micromechanical approaches, 7,8 multiscale/homogenization approaches, [9][10][11] and macromechanical/phenomenological approaches. [12][13][14][15][16] Those modeling strategies are characterized by different scales of analysis. In particular, when the focus is towards large-scale real structures, multiscale and macromechanical approaches appear as promising options, as reducing masonry material to an equivalent homogenized medium, characterized by a nonlinear and history-dependent stress-strain relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These models establish proper relationships between average masonry strains and stresses, commonly making use of constitutive laws with damage and plasticity inner variables. Despite isotropic models are largely adopted [9,10,11], because of their simplicity and reduced number of material parameters needed, these do not allow to describe the anisotropic nature of the response, typical of masonry with regular texture in which mortar joints act as plane of weakness. Thus, the most advanced macromodels account for the substantial discrepancy among mechanical properties observed in different material directions by making use of anisotropic plasticity or damage formulations [12,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%