2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and dynamic flexural strength of 99.5% alumina: Relation to surface roughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These microstructures observed were similar to those commonly reported (Ref 8,9). The reaction layer phase was characterized as Ti 3 (Cu+Al) 3 O, using EDX, in both D-96 AG (Fig. 9a, F) and in D-100 AG (Fig.…”
Section: Microstructure Of Brazed Jointssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These microstructures observed were similar to those commonly reported (Ref 8,9). The reaction layer phase was characterized as Ti 3 (Cu+Al) 3 O, using EDX, in both D-96 AG (Fig. 9a, F) and in D-100 AG (Fig.…”
Section: Microstructure Of Brazed Jointssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For each material, the R a results are similar for the rubble, the corner and the biaxial fracture surfaces, again supporting the potential link between fragments from ballistic and flexural tests. Other researchers have observed a similar lack of difference in fracture surfaces between alumina ceramics tested at different strain rates [28,29], but this information has not been previously quantified. Caution, however, is required when considering the rubble fragments due to the differences observed in Hexoloy SA fracture surfaces, which are discussed below.…”
Section: Fracture Surface Analysis Initial Observationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…38,39 Previous studies have reported that the e and S of brittle materials such as Al 2 O 3 are improved with decreased surface roughness. 38,40 Cheng et al conducted a digital image correlation analysis and showed a recognizable stress concentration at the valleys of a rough surface, where the stress concentration was induced around the pores, reducing S and e. 41 In addition, the interaction between the pores and other defects, such as pores and cracks, can affect the stress concentration and risk of crack propagation. 42,43 Therefore, the increased roughness and porosity owing to hygrothermal degradation induce stress concentration and have a destructive effect on S and e. As the hygrothermal environment becomes more severe, the number of defects and their damage potential simultaneously increase, resulting in a more drastic decrease in S and e.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Hygrothermal Degradation Of Mechanic...mentioning
confidence: 99%