2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-017-1210-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and dynamic compression strength of hot-pressed boron carbide using a dumbbell-shaped specimen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is very different than what is observed for concrete, glass, and rock 3,7 that show a strong dependence on hydrostatic pressure when on the tensile meridian (the strength increases as the hydrostatic pressure increases, typically on the order of σfalse~/P=1.01.5). This is also different than what is observed for boron carbide when on the compressive meridian where the strength increases dramatically going from σfalse~=6.1GPa at P = 2.0 GPa 15 to σfalse~=12.3GPa at P = 8.0 GPa 17 (although the pressures are much higher than those presented in Figure 6). There also appears to be no noticeable strain rate effect as the plate impact spall experiments are at ε˙=105s1 and the other data are quasi‐static ε˙=104s1 (this lack of strain rate effect has also been observed in compression, for this same material 15,26 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…This is very different than what is observed for concrete, glass, and rock 3,7 that show a strong dependence on hydrostatic pressure when on the tensile meridian (the strength increases as the hydrostatic pressure increases, typically on the order of σfalse~/P=1.01.5). This is also different than what is observed for boron carbide when on the compressive meridian where the strength increases dramatically going from σfalse~=6.1GPa at P = 2.0 GPa 15 to σfalse~=12.3GPa at P = 8.0 GPa 17 (although the pressures are much higher than those presented in Figure 6). There also appears to be no noticeable strain rate effect as the plate impact spall experiments are at ε˙=105s1 and the other data are quasi‐static ε˙=104s1 (this lack of strain rate effect has also been observed in compression, for this same material 15,26 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Traditionally, the high strain rate properties of ceramic materials are analysed in compression using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) technique [2][3][4]. The SHPB method uses a small sample sandwiched between two long bars which act as load cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally the size distribution is sufficient if the isotropic damage tensor is used, as in the simulations in this paper. Size and orientation distributions, typically obtained through detail microCT characterization, can be input directly into the model; if such distributions are not available, the distributions can be calibrated by matching the rate-dependent strength under uniaxial stress loading (a dumbbell test [104] would be ideal, but such data is often not available). One input parameter that must often be fit is the friction coefficient associated with sliding in the plane of the defect -in the case of boron carbide, this can be estimated from the properties of graphite.…”
Section: Calibration Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%