2020
DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and dynamic aspects of cerebro-cerebellar functional connectivity are associated with self-reported measures of impulsivity: A resting-state fMRI study

Abstract: Human and animal brain studies bring converging evidence on a possible role for the cerebellum and the cerebro-cerebellar system in impulsivity. However, the precise nature of the relation between cerebro-cerebellar coupling and impulsivity is far from understood. Characterizing functional connectivity (FC) patterns between large-scale brain networks, which mediate different forms of impulsivity, and the cerebellum can improve our understanding of this relation. Here, we analyzed static and dynamic fe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(93 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intracranial electric stimulation studies in animals reported that stimulation of the vermis dampens impulsive aggressive responses [ 24 ], arguably through Purkinje cell-related inhibition of the forebrain [ 23 ]. In addition, the presence of structural pathways between the cerebellum and reward-sensitive brain areas such as the basal ganglia [ 71 , 72 ] has recently been complemented by research showing functional connectivity between the vermis and basal ganglia [ 73 , 74 ]. It was found that stronger signal dependency between these areas was associated with lower levels of impulsivity [ 73 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intracranial electric stimulation studies in animals reported that stimulation of the vermis dampens impulsive aggressive responses [ 24 ], arguably through Purkinje cell-related inhibition of the forebrain [ 23 ]. In addition, the presence of structural pathways between the cerebellum and reward-sensitive brain areas such as the basal ganglia [ 71 , 72 ] has recently been complemented by research showing functional connectivity between the vermis and basal ganglia [ 73 , 74 ]. It was found that stronger signal dependency between these areas was associated with lower levels of impulsivity [ 73 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the presence of structural pathways between the cerebellum and reward-sensitive brain areas such as the basal ganglia [ 71 , 72 ] has recently been complemented by research showing functional connectivity between the vermis and basal ganglia [ 73 , 74 ]. It was found that stronger signal dependency between these areas was associated with lower levels of impulsivity [ 73 ]. The anatomical and functional relationship between the vermis, basal ganglia, and forebrain suggests an active contribution of the vermis to approach- and reward-related action tendencies [ 75 ] and impulse control [ 76 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that very few studies have used multiple methodologies (e.g., chronic headache [ 34 ], disorders of consciousness [DOCs] [ 35 ]). Similarly, in cognitive and behavioral applications, some studies have used sliding-window and clustering methods (e.g., task prediction [ 22 ], cognitive and behavioral flexibility [ 36 ]), some have used coactivation patterns (CAP) analysis (e.g., naturalistic stimuli [ 37 ], multiple tasks [ 38 ]) and HMM (e.g., sleep stage [ 39 ], impulsivity [ 40 ]), and very few have used multiple methods (e.g., working memory task [ 41 ]). A complete list of the reviewed studies can be found in Supplementary Tables S1 , S2 , and S3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such dynamic FC analyses promise a deeper understanding of dynamic interactions of brain regions within and across these functional networks [ 15 17 ] in health and disease. Dynamic FC measures have been associated with differences in individual attentional performance [ 18 , 19 ] and impulsivity [ 20 , 21 ]. For example, altered FC dynamics have been observed in participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [ 22 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%