2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and dynamic adaptations for service-based systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiment, we are mainly concerned with five categories of faults: API usage faults, data manipulation faults, message exchange faults, interface faults, and service logic faults. Other faults such as QoS unsatisfied faults [21] were not studied in the experiment.…”
Section: Threats To Validity and Other Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experiment, we are mainly concerned with five categories of faults: API usage faults, data manipulation faults, message exchange faults, interface faults, and service logic faults. Other faults such as QoS unsatisfied faults [21] were not studied in the experiment.…”
Section: Threats To Validity and Other Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, a fault is a problem that results in some abnormality condition at runtime [1]. Service faults can fall into one of the four categories: healthy, impacted, hidden and faulty [16].…”
Section: Some Observed Faults In Soa Based Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, a fault is a problem that occurs when a service invocation made by an SBS results in some abnormal behavior at runtime [1]. IEEE [2] defines more precisely a software fault as an incorrect step, process or data definition in a computer program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Modularity: Software components should embed a high modularity to be effectively composed into applications.  Adaptability: Adaptability is essential in two cases; providing variation points [9] and resolving partial matching problems [10]. The end result is the increased level of applicability.…”
Section: Figure 1 Caas Reusability Attributes Derived From 2 Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%