2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

States of indecision in the brain: ERP reflections of syntactic agreement violations versus visual degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This aspect should be captured in the trial-by-trial variability and separately between subjects by looking over the latency and duration of the potentials. If this is the case, ERPs should elicit late positivity with high amplitude [81] and ongoing negative ERP over the prefrontal cortex suggesting indecisiveness [82]. Since natural images represent recognizable structures and objects, as compared to unidentified forms for the synthetic fractal images, it might infer different reasoning mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aspect should be captured in the trial-by-trial variability and separately between subjects by looking over the latency and duration of the potentials. If this is the case, ERPs should elicit late positivity with high amplitude [81] and ongoing negative ERP over the prefrontal cortex suggesting indecisiveness [82]. Since natural images represent recognizable structures and objects, as compared to unidentified forms for the synthetic fractal images, it might infer different reasoning mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LPC was interpreted as a result of a differentiation between licit and illicit neologisms and followed an earlier negativity (N400), which was ascribed to the detection of a nonexistent structure. A late positivity was previously found and associated with the re-analysis of syntactic complexity and ambiguity or the violation of (morpho-) syntactic structures (Friederici, 1995(Friederici, , 2002Frisch & Schlesewsky, 2005;Hagoort, 2003;Meerendonk, Chwilla, & Kolk, 2013). The N400 component, however, has been ascribed to the differentiation between existent and non-existent words in numerous studies (Bentin et al, 1999;Holcomb, 1988Holcomb, , 1993Holcomb & Neville, 1990;Kutas & Hillyard, 1980).…”
Section: Learnabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In view of this, the absence of a LAN effect and the presence of an N400 in our study is not surprising, given that agreement computation in Arabic is not always predictable based on the features of the agreement controller alone, but is dependent upon specific syntactic properties of the construction involved, such as word-order and whether or not the subject is overt, as well as properties at the syntax-semantic interface such as humanness (see below for a detailed discussion). The P600 effects in our study can be plausibly interpreted as reflecting repair or reanalysis processes associated with agreement violations (Friederici, 2002, 2011; Bornkessel & Schlesewsky, 2006), thought to be triggered by domain-general conflict monitoring processes (Van de Meerendonk, Chwilla, & Kolk, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%