2017
DOI: 10.18261/issn.2464-3378-2017-01-01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statens oppreisningsansvar ved menneskerettighetsbrudd

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a feature article in a national newspaper (Kaltenborn, 2018), a researcher at the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), describes, in the title, that the building of second homes is beyond all limits. Another researcher, Aall (2017), has written a newspaper article stating already in the title that second-home tourism is unsustainable, not only because of the loss of nature but also regarding energy and resource consumption in general. In statements from the "Friends of the Earth Norway" (Naturvernforbundet) NGO Christensen (2019) and Eriksen (2022) have claimed that the second homes are a threat to Norwegian nature and that it is unsustainable to build new second homes, demanding that no new second-home developments be allowed in pristine nature.…”
Section: Governmental Discoursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a feature article in a national newspaper (Kaltenborn, 2018), a researcher at the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), describes, in the title, that the building of second homes is beyond all limits. Another researcher, Aall (2017), has written a newspaper article stating already in the title that second-home tourism is unsustainable, not only because of the loss of nature but also regarding energy and resource consumption in general. In statements from the "Friends of the Earth Norway" (Naturvernforbundet) NGO Christensen (2019) and Eriksen (2022) have claimed that the second homes are a threat to Norwegian nature and that it is unsustainable to build new second homes, demanding that no new second-home developments be allowed in pristine nature.…”
Section: Governmental Discoursesmentioning
confidence: 99%