1973
DOI: 10.1080/0305764730030302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statements, Language and Art: Some Comments on Professor Hirst's Paper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hirst's conception of art however is limited and rigid, seeing art as a language which is a conduit for a form of knowledge; moreover, the form of knowledge is simply knowledge of art. The notion of art being a language is challenged by Peter Scrimshaw's article in the same issue [6]. Scrimshaw points out that, while Picasso's Guernica, for example, was not painted in 'English' it was also not painted in a language called 'artistic', merely awaiting a translator, pointing out that 'such translations are not possible because there is no initial linguistic entity to be the subject of such an enterprise' (p. 137).…”
Section: Art As 'A Way Of Knowing'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hirst's conception of art however is limited and rigid, seeing art as a language which is a conduit for a form of knowledge; moreover, the form of knowledge is simply knowledge of art. The notion of art being a language is challenged by Peter Scrimshaw's article in the same issue [6]. Scrimshaw points out that, while Picasso's Guernica, for example, was not painted in 'English' it was also not painted in a language called 'artistic', merely awaiting a translator, pointing out that 'such translations are not possible because there is no initial linguistic entity to be the subject of such an enterprise' (p. 137).…”
Section: Art As 'A Way Of Knowing'mentioning
confidence: 99%