1993
DOI: 10.1093/clind/16.5.627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statement of the Tuberculosis Committee of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative results obtained by the nucleic acid amplification methods for culture-positive specimens may perhaps be explained by the presence of inhibitors of enzymatic amplification reactions, as earlier reported for different PCR applications (3,5,19). The unequal distribution of bacteria in specimens with a low target number is another possible explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The negative results obtained by the nucleic acid amplification methods for culture-positive specimens may perhaps be explained by the presence of inhibitors of enzymatic amplification reactions, as earlier reported for different PCR applications (3,5,19). The unequal distribution of bacteria in specimens with a low target number is another possible explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The four false-negative results (three in the NALC series and one in the SDS series) may be explained by (i) the presence of possible amplification inhibitors in the sample, analogous to those reported for PCR protocols in which inhibition of the enzyme reaction is a well-known drawback (18,21,24); (ii) nonuniform distribution of microorganisms in the test suspension, since M. tuberculosis is known to form cords and clumps (14,15); and (iii) the failure of RNA synthesis due to poor viability of the cells as demonstrated by the extremely long period until detection of these particular isolates in culture (6 to 8 weeks) and their overall poor growth (one to three colonies formed on solid media). On the other hand, it is less likely that any medication led to nondetectability of the mycobacteria, as the majority of the positive specimens in this study was obtained from patients receiving standard anti-TB therapy.…”
Section: Mtdmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections usually requires 2 to 8 weeks. The recent increase in new cases of tuberculosis has shown that the need for rapid, specific diagnostic assays for M. tuberculosis is urgent (3,4,18). Most of the nucleic acid amplification assays, which are predominantly based on the amplification of mycobacterial DNA by PCR, are rapid and specific; however, they are not yet suitable for use in routine clinical laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased incidence of tuberculosis and the recent outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis have increasing public health significance (3,4,18). The diagnosis of tuberculosis on the basis of clinical and radiological findings, the presence of acid-fast bacilli in clinical smears, and other laboratory results are presumptive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%