2007
DOI: 10.1525/fsr.2007.20.2.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statement of Steven L. Chanenson Before the United States Sentencing Commission Regarding Retroactivity of Crack Guidelines Amendments (November 2007)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The USSC recognized that providing more guidance would be needed to increase uniformity in the retroactive application of the crack guideline in light of potentially contradictory policy goals (Chanenson, 2007). The USSC and the AO sought to structure courts’ discretion in implementation with summits, especially since time was of the essence and because districts varied in their crack retroactivity caseloads (Schmitt et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Policy Of Crack Retroactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The USSC recognized that providing more guidance would be needed to increase uniformity in the retroactive application of the crack guideline in light of potentially contradictory policy goals (Chanenson, 2007). The USSC and the AO sought to structure courts’ discretion in implementation with summits, especially since time was of the essence and because districts varied in their crack retroactivity caseloads (Schmitt et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Policy Of Crack Retroactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%