State support for the digitalization of SMEs in European countries

Abstract

COVID-19 and Russia’s war against Ukraine have created many challenges for the business models of SMEs, stimulating them to develop alternative forms of business. Among the key alternatives, one should single out digitization. However, imperfections of Ukraine’s state support system for digital transformation necessitate adapting the positive practice of leading countries with excellent business digitalization. Therefore, this paper structures the practical experience of state support of European countries in the digitalization of SMEs. The study conducts a cluster analysis to identify countries whose experience in state support for business digitalization is the best for adoption. Clustering employed the criterion of using key digitization instruments: internet of things, integration of business processes into electronic processes, digital integration with customers/suppliers, cloud services, big data analysis, and artificial intelligence. Thus, 4 clusters were identified (the first cluster comprises 16 countries, the second – 2, the third – 5, and the fourth – 7). These findings contributed to the selection of some key measures. They included: expanding the financial capabilities of SMEs to adopt digital technologies in their processes; formation of digital hard skills among entrepreneurs and increasing the personnel potential of SME digitization; creation of a favorable business environment to stimulate the digital activity of SMEs; and popularization of business digitalization strategy as a component of digital transformation strategy in society.

Interaction between decentralized financial services and the traditional banking system: A comparative analysis

“…Decentralized finance and traditional finance are based on different principles and infrastructures, but they also share common financial mechanisms and objectives (Strilets et al, 2022;Shkolnyk et al, 2021). DeFi operates in a decentralized network that is built on blockchain technology, eliminating the need for central authorities or intermediaries such as banks or clearing houses.…”

The war year 2022 is a year of trials for the journal and the publishing house

“…The study argues that the created reserve of economic security, in particular, due to the intensive digitization of the financial sector, allowed Ukraine to survive the first weeks of the war and ensure the functioning of the financial system. In addition, digitalization has also been crucial for small and medium-sized businesses (Strilets et al, 2022).…”

Country performance in e-sport: Social and economic development determinants

“…A number of academic papers consider the digitalization of society as an impetus for sustainable economic development (Melnyk et al, 2021, Navickas, et al, 2021, the growth of companies' competitiveness, job creation, etc. (Strilets et al, 2022;Kolodiziev et al, 2022;Melnyk et al, 2022), a shift in investment (Cicea & Marinescu, 2021, Govdeli, 2022. The attention of contemporary scholars is focused on exploring various aspects and opportunities for sustainable economic growth (Deineko, et al, 2022a,b;Oliinyk, et al, 2019;Pereira-Moliner, et al, 2021;Habanik, et al, 2019) in response to the challenges of Industry 4.0, focused on digitization and process sharing in the economy and the emergence of smart businesses and growth of large technology companies (Bethlendi, et al, 2022).…”