State Public Insurance Coverage Policies and Postpartum Care Among Immigrants

Abstract

ImportanceProfessional medical organizations recommend that adults receive routine postpartum care. Yet, some states restrict public insurance coverage for undocumented immigrants and recently documented immigrants (those who received legal documentation status within the past 5 years).ObjectiveTo examine the association between public insurance coverage and postpartum care among low-income immigrants and the difference in receipt of postpartum care among immigrants relative to nonimmigrants.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA pooled, cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System for 19 states and New York City including low-income adults with a live birth between 2012 and 2019.ExposureGiving birth in a state that offered public insurance coverage for postpartum care to recently documented or undocumented immigrants.Main Outcomes and MeasuresSelf-reported receipt of postpartum care by the category of coverage offered (full coverage: states that offered publicly funded postpartum care regardless of immigration status; moderate coverage: states that offered publicly funded postpartum care to lawfully residing immigrants without a 5-year waiting period, but did not offer postpartum care to undocumented immigrants; no coverage: states that did not offer publicly funded postpartum care to lawfully present immigrants before 5 years of legal residence or to undocumented immigrants).ResultsThe study included 72 981 low-income adults (20 971 immigrants [29%] and 52 010 nonimmigrants [71%]). Of the 19 included states and New York City, 6 offered full coverage, 9 offered moderate coverage, and 4 offered no coverage; 1 state (Oregon) switched from offering moderate coverage to offering full coverage. Compared with the states that offered full coverage, receipt of postpartum care among immigrants was 7.0–percentage-points lower (95% CI, −10.6 to −3.4 percentage points) in the states that offered moderate coverage and 11.3–percentage-points lower (95% CI, −13.9 to −8.8 percentage points) in the states that offered no coverage. The differences in the receipt of postpartum care among immigrants relative to nonimmigrants were also associated with the coverage categories. Compared with the states that offered full coverage, there was a 3.3–percentage-point larger difference (95% CI, −5.3 to −1.4 percentage points) in the states that offered moderate coverage and a 7.7–percentage-point larger difference (95% CI, −10.3 to −5.0 percentage points) in the states that offered no coverage.Conclusions and RelevanceCompared with states without insurance restrictions, immigrants living in states with public insurance restrictions were less likely to receive postpartum care. Restricting public insurance coverage may be an important policy-driven barrier to receipt of recommended pregnancy care and improved maternal health among immigrants.

Incorrect Dates in Figure Footnotes and Legend

“…The Original Investigation titled “State Public Insurance Coverage Policies and Postpartum Care Among Immigrants,” published in the July 18, 2023, issue of JAMA , was corrected to fix incorrect dates listed for the same state. In Figure 1, footnote c , the date should have been “(in 2014)” for Georgia.…”