2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00200-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-price densities under heterogeneous beliefs, the smile effect, and implied risk aversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…r studying effects of heterogeneous beliefs - Detemple and Murthy (1994), Zapatero (1998), Basak (2000), and Ziegler (2000Ziegler ( , 2002Ziegler ( , and 2003.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…r studying effects of heterogeneous beliefs - Detemple and Murthy (1994), Zapatero (1998), Basak (2000), and Ziegler (2000Ziegler ( , 2002Ziegler ( , and 2003.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bates (2008) focuses on heterogeneity with respect to crash aversion. Ziegler (2002) mentioned investor heterogeneity in beliefs as a potential cause for multimodal risk-neutral distributions already but he argues in Ziegler (2007) that the heterogeneity in beliefs required to explain the pricing kernel puzzle is too large to be realistic.…”
Section: David P Brown and Jens Carsten Jackwerthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This direct relationship remains without any explicit assumption on the correlation between the volatility and the stock price (e.g., Brigo and Mercurio, 2002), on the shape of the state-price density function, or of the underlying stock-volatility density function (e.g., Ziegler, 2002), and with the underlying stock volatility considered as the sole source of uncertainty.…”
Section: The Implied Volatility Smile In a Typical Simulation Runmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a different perspective, Ziegler (2002) observed that under heterogeneous beliefs about the true mean of the constant instantaneous increase in expected dividends, which is another A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 4 parameter of the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the state-price density function is not log normal. As a consequence, the non-log-normality of the equilibrium state-price density gives rise to a volatility smile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%