State, power and global order

Rosenboim, Or

doi:10.1177/0047117819840803

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(18 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In reality, the state has been increasingly facing problems that are rooted into a space wide than the state. Recently, Rosenboim (2019) remarked that about a century ago scientists and policy-makers signalled the insufficiency of state policies to overcome problems of a scale larger than the state scale. Since the second industrial revolution, for example, economic crises were issues overcoming the response capability of the single state.…”

Section: Theory and Conceptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The World Order Lifecycle and World Power Competition

Attinà

2021

Global Power Shift

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The world has passed through the initial phase of implementation of the primary policies of the American world order and the following phase of delegitimation of such policies, the trade, finance and security policy. Though many states have been socialized to the policies of the American hegemony, the delegitimation of the American order has been growing because especially the trade and finance world policies have not been apt to face the demands of individual states and to respond to the problems of the whole system. The world is now in the transition process that will run across the coalition reconfiguration and macro-decision phase. In the current transition, three world powers, the United States, China and Russia, have potentials to lead the process by proposing the revision of the existing order and by assembling countries into the coalition able to build the new order. Transition is an open process to go through and to observe carefully. The revisionism of the three world powers is confirmed by the analysis while they are still unable to assemble the demands of large groups of states and build the coalition of the next world order. Keywords Hegemonic order • Order life cycle • Leadership • Revisionism • Coalition powerThe political order of the present world was created by the coalition of the Western countries after the two world wars over the ruins of the Great Britain-led order. Its effectiveness and legitimacy have been declining during the last thirty years of the past century. Today, the world order is going through a period of transition that is characterized by conflict and a growing number of clashes between the world powers. Predictably, such order transition will go through two phases. In the first one, each world power will push ahead her preferred world order project and organize the coalition of the countries determined to bring such project into being. Transition will be completed after the second phase, the macro-decision phase in which two

show abstract

Section: Theory and Conceptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The World Order Lifecycle and World Power Competition

Attinà

2021

Global Power Shift

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Today's world is politically, economically and technologically more complex than when the institutional pillars of the current order were founded in the 1940s and 1950s (Eilstrup-Sangiovanni and Hofmann, 2019). The global political space embodies an alternative account of modernity that challenges the idea that the territorial nation-state represents the final stage of human progress (Rosenboim, 2019). It was found on fundamental principles such as national sovereignty, economic liberalism and inclusive, rule-based multilateralism (Eilstrup-Sangiovanni and Hofmann, 2019).…”

Section: The Global Ordermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It was found on fundamental principles such as national sovereignty, economic liberalism and inclusive, rule-based multilateralism (Eilstrup-Sangiovanni and Hofmann, 2019). The new global order was characterized by the extension of the American model of liberal democracy to the entire world (Rosenboim, 2019). It incorporates the concept of global governance, inter-states, international institutions, transnational networks and agencies, which function with variable effect and effectiveness to promote, regulate and manage the common affairs of humanity (Kacowicz, 2012).…”

Section: The Global Ordermentioning

confidence: 99%

The global order, regional integration and multiculturally diverse stakeholders

Igwe

Lock

Ochinanwata

et al. 2020

IJOA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to explore how regional organizations manage its affairs, peace-building and economic development focussing on a crucial analytical dimension: the link between global order, regional integration and multi-culturally diverse stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach This conceptual paper focusses on the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) by grounding the arguments based on the conceptualization of regional integration and “stakeholder management”. It offers an exploration of concepts of the “new global order”, “multilateralism”, “institutions”, effective stakeholder collaboration and cross-cultural management. Findings Defined in terms of EU-style institutionalization’ ECOWAS is one of the modes of regionalism classified as failed. The organization has struggled with the member-states internal crisis, inter-state border crisis, a growing army of unemployed youths, high political-instability, militant terrorism, cybersecurity and farmers-herders conflict. Also, it has a poor implementation of treaties and poor cultural communications. Originality/value Besides contributing to the emerging interest in the understanding of how regional organizations improve organizational efficiency, this study develops an interest in stakeholder management from the perspective of political, economic and peace-building organizations with different national, cultural and political experiences.

show abstract

“…The phrase 'the global imaginary' is at the heart of Or Rosenboim's article titled 'State, Power, and Global Order'; its theme is the growth of 'a political vision that encapsulated the world as a whole'. The article explores the issue, history and reality of 'how to see the world', tracing the development of thinking about 'political space' and reflecting on the discipline's 'spatial categories' 104 Rosenboim's account is of an expanding 'global imaginary'. Crucially, she argues that the nation-state model, once regarded as 'the new modernity', has been progressively challenged through the past century, and her historical analysis 'gives rise to doubts' about the teleological approach 'that conceptualises modernity in terms of statehood'.…”

Section: The Global Imaginarymentioning

confidence: 99%

International Relations: The Story So Far

Booth¹

2019

International Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

‘The Story So Far’ is the conclusion of the first centenary Special Issue of the journal International Relations. The issue marks 100 years since the birth of the academic discipline of International Relations (IR), whose institutional moment was the endowment establishing the Department of International Politics at the University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, at the end of 1918, and its subsequent opening in April 1919. The collection of articles marking this unique event consists of reflections by a group of leading scholars on themes of continuity and change at the international level of world politics in that century. The present article considers these reflections in the context of problematising our attempts to understand the long history and complex dynamics of international relations.

show abstract

State, power and global order

Cited by 10 publications

References 17 publications

The World Order Lifecycle and World Power Competition

The World Order Lifecycle and World Power Competition

The global order, regional integration and multiculturally diverse stakeholders

International Relations: The Story So Far

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About