2021
DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State ownership and the risk‐reducing effect of corporate derivative use: Evidence from China

Abstract: Using hand-collected derivative use data on publicly listed firms in China, we document that derivative use has a significant risk-reducing effect, but this effect is 40% weaker in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than in non-SOEs. We also find that soft-budget constraints and information transmission inefficiency are two mechanisms through which state ownership impedes this risk reduction. First, financial distress reduces the impact of the soft-budget constraints, mitigating the weaker risk-reducing effect of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(145 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on Triki (2006), Chang et al (2015), and Guo et al (2021), data on the use of derivative are collected manually in firms' annual reports in the following way: Search for derivatives, hedges, forwards, futures, options, swaps, swaps, financial assets (liabilities) held for trading, assets (liabilities) at fair value through profit or loss, other (non) current assets (liabilities), etc., gains and losses on changes in fair value, investment income, and risks associated with (related to) financial instruments in the annual report, and determine whether the company uses derivatives, the fair value of derivatives and the impact of t derivatives on the gains and losses on changes in fair value and on investment income, etc., according to the context.…”
Section: Sample Selection and Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on Triki (2006), Chang et al (2015), and Guo et al (2021), data on the use of derivative are collected manually in firms' annual reports in the following way: Search for derivatives, hedges, forwards, futures, options, swaps, swaps, financial assets (liabilities) held for trading, assets (liabilities) at fair value through profit or loss, other (non) current assets (liabilities), etc., gains and losses on changes in fair value, investment income, and risks associated with (related to) financial instruments in the annual report, and determine whether the company uses derivatives, the fair value of derivatives and the impact of t derivatives on the gains and losses on changes in fair value and on investment income, etc., according to the context.…”
Section: Sample Selection and Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core explanatory variable is the fintech index (Fintech). This study draws on the variable design of Deng et al [54], Liu et al [55], and others to use the digital financial inclusion index as a proxy variable for Fintech.…”
Section: The Explanatory Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes SOEs more susceptible to political uncertainty. Because in addition to the usual political influence, their operational and personnel decisions are also under the influence of or even controlled by the local leaders, especially for SOEs that are controlled by local governments (Chen, Tang, Wu, & Yang, 2021;Guo, Pan, & Tian, 2021). As a result, strict government control and restriction continually affect firms' general operations and decision-making, leaving them more sensitive to political risk.…”
Section: The Economic Impact Of Political Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we examine H3 to test whether crosssectional variation in firms' ownership structure affects the relationship between political uncertainty and cost stickiness. To conduct the analysis, we create a dummy variable, SOE, which equals one if a firm's ultimate controller is the state and zero otherwise (Guo et al, 2021). We then interact SOE with the political uncertainty measure and add relative interaction terms into the baseline model.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%