2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of traceability in the Norwegian food sectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…And also, traceability records and traceability time have been used to evaluate the system's capability to obtain and process traceable information (Dzwolak, 2016). Regarding method adopted, approaches such as simulated recall methods (Donnelly et al, 2012;Forås et al, 2015) and factorial and cluster analyses (Banterle and Stranieri, 2008b) have been employed to assess system performance.…”
Section: ■ Performance Evaluation Of Traceability Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And also, traceability records and traceability time have been used to evaluate the system's capability to obtain and process traceable information (Dzwolak, 2016). Regarding method adopted, approaches such as simulated recall methods (Donnelly et al, 2012;Forås et al, 2015) and factorial and cluster analyses (Banterle and Stranieri, 2008b) have been employed to assess system performance.…”
Section: ■ Performance Evaluation Of Traceability Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing measures and methods are not fully applicable to the evaluation and acceptance of various TSs. On the one hand, a common indicator system particularly used for different product chains is scarce, which may increase the difficulty of performance evaluation by government regulators and are not conducive to the comparison of TSs in distinct industries (Forås et al, 2015). Future research could develop systematic, standard, and operable evaluation index systems that are more applicable to general product TSs on the basis of theoretical and practical investigations.…”
Section: ■ Review On the Performance Evaluation Of Traceability Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of traceability has been mentioned by the workshop participants as a vulnerability for the retail/ HoReCa because this will limit the capabilities to react in a situation of crises but it also will affect the consumers trust in the product. In a study performed by Forås et al (2015) in Norway showed that the most food sectors in Norway were able to trace back their products to the origin, for fish (including salmon) this was 83%. Vertical coordination and integration has occurred in the salmon supply chain both upstream in farming and down-stream in retailing and have improved its performance and flexibility (Tveterås and Kvaløy 2004).…”
Section: Lack Of Traceabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traceability plays a key role in food chain management, especially in the case of highly perishable and rapidly deteriorating foods such as milk and dairy products (Mania et al, 2018). Few studies have been published on the traceability of food products and are generally related to meat (fish and red meat; Forås et al, 2015) and fruits and vegetables (Dandage et al, 2017); studies related to milk and dairy products remain scarce (Maldonado-Siman et al, 2013;Fåras et al, 2015). Despite the existence of a few studies evaluating consumer perceptions about traceability (Charlebois and Haratifar, 2015;Matzembacher et al, 2018), only one study has focused on the dairy producers' point of view (Lopes et al, 2020) but it did not evaluate artisanal cheese producers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%