Handbook of Public Policy and Public Administration in China 2020
DOI: 10.4337/9781789909951.00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the field: research on public policy and public administration in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, China's unique policy‐making process limits the applicability of Western‐based theoretical frameworks for public policy (Moran et al, 2006; Zang et al, 2020). Governance in China's post‐1978 “Reform” era is frequently described as “fragmented” (Lieberthal & Lampton, 1992; Mertha, 2009) and “adaptive” (Heilmann & Perry, 2011) in ways that infuse the economy with institutionalized structured uncertainty (Breznitz & Murphree, 2011), characterized by persistently weak legal institutions (Delisle, 2019), frequent institutional changes (Miao et al, 2018), and weak enforcement in areas like antitrust (Zhang, 2021) and intellectual property (Mertha, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, China's unique policy‐making process limits the applicability of Western‐based theoretical frameworks for public policy (Moran et al, 2006; Zang et al, 2020). Governance in China's post‐1978 “Reform” era is frequently described as “fragmented” (Lieberthal & Lampton, 1992; Mertha, 2009) and “adaptive” (Heilmann & Perry, 2011) in ways that infuse the economy with institutionalized structured uncertainty (Breznitz & Murphree, 2011), characterized by persistently weak legal institutions (Delisle, 2019), frequent institutional changes (Miao et al, 2018), and weak enforcement in areas like antitrust (Zhang, 2021) and intellectual property (Mertha, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%