2018
DOI: 10.1080/16000870.2018.1445364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-of-the-art stochastic data assimilation methods for high-dimensional non-Gaussian problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because this transition occurs on horizontal dimensions that are smaller than the typical grid size of large-scale ice sheet models, many studies have focussed on the ability of the numerical model to properly simulate grounding line migration using synthetic experiments (e.g. Vieli and Payne, 2005;Durand et al, 2009;Gladstone et al, 2012;Seroussi et al, 2014). Two Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Projects (MISMIP) have allowed the identification of the minimum requirements to properly resolve GL motion: (i) inclusion of membrane stresses and (ii) a sufficiently small grid size or a subgrid interpolation of the GL (Pattyn et al, 2012(Pattyn et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because this transition occurs on horizontal dimensions that are smaller than the typical grid size of large-scale ice sheet models, many studies have focussed on the ability of the numerical model to properly simulate grounding line migration using synthetic experiments (e.g. Vieli and Payne, 2005;Durand et al, 2009;Gladstone et al, 2012;Seroussi et al, 2014). Two Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Projects (MISMIP) have allowed the identification of the minimum requirements to properly resolve GL motion: (i) inclusion of membrane stresses and (ii) a sufficiently small grid size or a subgrid interpolation of the GL (Pattyn et al, 2012(Pattyn et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the SMC, we use an optimal particle filter, which takes advantage of the linear Gaussian observation model and the Gaussian transition density of the state variables in our current SEBM. More generally, when the observation model is nonlinear and the transition density is non Gaussian, the optimal particle filter can be replaced by implicit particle filters [12,35] or local particle filters [38,39]; we refer to [8,25,49] for other data assimilation techniques. The details of the algorithm are provided in Section 7.3.…”
Section: Sampling the Posterior By Particle Mcmc Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the true parameters are known, the Bayesian approach has demonstrated great success in state estimation, thanks to the developments in Monte Carlo sampling and data assimilation techniques (see e.g. [8,25,49]). However, the problem of joint state-parameter estimation, especially when the parameter estimation is ill-posed, has had relatively little success in nonlinear cases and remains a challenge [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general formulation (101) with the coefficients p * ij chosen appropriately 2 leads to a large class of socalled ensemble transform particle filters (Reich and Cotter 2015). Ensemble transform particle filters generally result in biased and inconsistent but robust estimates which have found applications to high-dimensional state space models (Evensen 2006, Vetra-Carvalho, van Leeuwen, Nerger, Barth, Altaf, Brasseur, Kirchgessner andBeckers 2018) for which traditional particle filters fail due to the 'curse of dimensionality' (Bengtsson, Bickel and Li 2008). More specifically, the class of ensemble transform particle filters includes the popular ensemble Kalman filters (Evensen 2006, Reich and Cotter 2015, Vetra-Carvalho et al 2018, Carrassi, Bocquet, Bertino and Evensen 2018 and so-called second-order accurate particle filters with coefficients p * ij in (101) chosen such that the weighted ensemble meanz…”
Section: Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%