2015
DOI: 10.4018/ijksr.2015010102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the Art on Ontology Alignment

Abstract: Ontology mapping as a semantic data integration approach has evolved from traditional data integration solutions. The core problems and open issues related to early data integration approaches are also applicable to ontology mapping on the Semantic Web community. Therefore, in this review the authors present the related literature, starting from the traditional data integration approaches, in order to highlight the evolution of data integration from the early approaches. Once the roots of semantic data integra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These works include YAM [52], systematic matching ensemble selection [53] or automatic tuning of the matcher parameters [54,49]. Similar research trends and results are also found for other types of data models, such as ontologies [5,55]. Ontology matching focuses on leveraging semantic information such as taxonomies, domain vocabularies, and resource descriptions, to improve matching techniques proposed for database schemas, which lack such semantic information [56,57].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These works include YAM [52], systematic matching ensemble selection [53] or automatic tuning of the matcher parameters [54,49]. Similar research trends and results are also found for other types of data models, such as ontologies [5,55]. Ontology matching focuses on leveraging semantic information such as taxonomies, domain vocabularies, and resource descriptions, to improve matching techniques proposed for database schemas, which lack such semantic information [56,57].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…e number of entities and relationships between entities are also increasing. For instance, the number of entities in Anatomy and Food was more than 2500 and 20000, respectively [9]. In addition, the scale of some domain ontologies in complex product design fields was large, such as aircraft, robots, and vehicle domain ontologies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%